<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saskatoon residential real estate sales on par with May 2008 in May 2009: SRAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/</link>
	<description>Where Saskatoon talks real estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12390</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12390</guid>
		<description>Saw the comments on MACD and thought I would add my own experience.

I have done my own studies on MACD, moving averages and various other technical indicators.  Basically, I wrote a computer program that used genetic algorithms to test various parameters to the technical indicators and then back tested them against historical data to see how well they actually perform.   My own conclusion was very mixed.  While in down or range bound markets you will usually do better with technical indicators, it is often only by a small margin.  On the other hand, if you use the same indicators that worked in say a bear market in a bull market you will underperform.  Basically it&#039;s all a bunch of BS since you always need another piece of information that you can&#039;t know.  That is, you need to know whether it is a bull / bear / range bound market ahead of time.  There is no one group of technical indicators that will outperform over an extended time period.  Look around on the internet and you can find similar studies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw the comments on MACD and thought I would add my own experience.</p>
<p>I have done my own studies on MACD, moving averages and various other technical indicators.  Basically, I wrote a computer program that used genetic algorithms to test various parameters to the technical indicators and then back tested them against historical data to see how well they actually perform.   My own conclusion was very mixed.  While in down or range bound markets you will usually do better with technical indicators, it is often only by a small margin.  On the other hand, if you use the same indicators that worked in say a bear market in a bull market you will underperform.  Basically it&#8217;s all a bunch of BS since you always need another piece of information that you can&#8217;t know.  That is, you need to know whether it is a bull / bear / range bound market ahead of time.  There is no one group of technical indicators that will outperform over an extended time period.  Look around on the internet and you can find similar studies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12387</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12387</guid>
		<description>No prob Steven.  I often jump in on conversations without reading the previous posts and sound like a moron.  Sometimes I sound that way anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No prob Steven.  I often jump in on conversations without reading the previous posts and sound like a moron.  Sometimes I sound that way anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crikey</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12386</link>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12386</guid>
		<description>Of course, Steven. Here are the links for Mish and Calculated Risk:

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/

Here are some other links that might interest you:

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/

http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/

http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Steven. Here are the links for Mish and Calculated Risk:</p>
<p><a href="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/</a></p>
<p>Here are some other links that might interest you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12385</guid>
		<description>Interesting article on Greater Fool today about a condo purchaser that successfully sued the developer in BC to rescind his deal and get his deposit back. Original article in the second link. Precedent setting in BC; will we see similar challenges elsewhere?

http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/06/04/condoholic/

http://www.vancouversun.com/Business/Court+rules+rescind+purchase+million+condo/1659340/story.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article on Greater Fool today about a condo purchaser that successfully sued the developer in BC to rescind his deal and get his deposit back. Original article in the second link. Precedent setting in BC; will we see similar challenges elsewhere?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/06/04/condoholic/" rel="nofollow">http://www.greaterfool.ca/2009/06/04/condoholic/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/Business/Court+rules+rescind+purchase+million+condo/1659340/story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vancouversun.com/Business/Court+rules+rescind+purchase+million+condo/1659340/story.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12384</guid>
		<description>Mark, if we&#039;re talking in-Canada migration, no question (housing and rentals). And I&#039;d certainly agree that for immigration, that there&#039;s potential to impact the rental market - but a lot of this influx might just as easily be negligible, as well. I&#039;m not knowledgeable enough in these areas, but wouldn&#039;t &quot;landed immigrant&quot; (vs. citizenship) status and lack of a current job history in Canada pose challenges in obtaining financing?

Completely off-topic, but it&#039;s now June. Does anyone know if they&#039;ve broken ground yet on the River Landing project? (they were supposed to start in May if I&#039;m not mistaken)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, if we&#8217;re talking in-Canada migration, no question (housing and rentals). And I&#8217;d certainly agree that for immigration, that there&#8217;s potential to impact the rental market &#8211; but a lot of this influx might just as easily be negligible, as well. I&#8217;m not knowledgeable enough in these areas, but wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;landed immigrant&#8221; (vs. citizenship) status and lack of a current job history in Canada pose challenges in obtaining financing?</p>
<p>Completely off-topic, but it&#8217;s now June. Does anyone know if they&#8217;ve broken ground yet on the River Landing project? (they were supposed to start in May if I&#8217;m not mistaken)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12383</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12383</guid>
		<description>Vinny,

You&#039;re right it is sometimes hard to get the correct tone of a post. I kinda get stuck with one posts tone and carry it to another. I will go pop a valium. ;)

Crikey,

Can you please provide a link for mish blog &amp; calculated risk. I&#039;d like to check them out.

Looking at statscan jobs numbers I see population has increased in all provinces. I suspect the word is out internationally Canada is fairing better than other places. But in those numbers there is no distiction of permanant residents. Are immigrants coming here working on a visa with intentions of sending money earned back to their home country?

Someways it is good, they are seemingly increasing demand for homes, and doing the jobs canadians don&#039;t want to do.

The downfall is they are not keeping their earnings in Canada. They are supporting extended family members in their homeland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vinny,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right it is sometimes hard to get the correct tone of a post. I kinda get stuck with one posts tone and carry it to another. I will go pop a valium. <img src='http://www.teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Crikey,</p>
<p>Can you please provide a link for mish blog &amp; calculated risk. I&#8217;d like to check them out.</p>
<p>Looking at statscan jobs numbers I see population has increased in all provinces. I suspect the word is out internationally Canada is fairing better than other places. But in those numbers there is no distiction of permanant residents. Are immigrants coming here working on a visa with intentions of sending money earned back to their home country?</p>
<p>Someways it is good, they are seemingly increasing demand for homes, and doing the jobs canadians don&#8217;t want to do.</p>
<p>The downfall is they are not keeping their earnings in Canada. They are supporting extended family members in their homeland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12382</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12382</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I would suggest the people moving here are either moving back home from BC and Alb or moving here because they need a job(Ontario).  The majority of people from Ontario are probably coming from places like Windsor where housing has been absolutely slaughtered.  I don&#039;t think they would have much equity.

I do believe the increase of people moving may put pressure on rentals but not house prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I would suggest the people moving here are either moving back home from BC and Alb or moving here because they need a job(Ontario).  The majority of people from Ontario are probably coming from places like Windsor where housing has been absolutely slaughtered.  I don&#8217;t think they would have much equity.</p>
<p>I do believe the increase of people moving may put pressure on rentals but not house prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12381</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12381</guid>
		<description>Mark, &quot;But with prices a full 25 percent higher even in a place like Calgary, I&#039;m guessing their weekly wages aren&#039;t 25 percent higher than Saskatoons.&quot;

This is a typical comparison, and generally inaccurate (not that I&#039;m a fan of Calgary, necessarily, but just to be fair...) Take a $275k house vs. $344k house (+25% higher). Over 35 years @ 3.5% you get monthly payments of $1,132 (SK) and $1,415 (AB) respectively, which is a difference of only $283. The difference in income tax offsets this by about $100, so you&#039;re down to $183. So at a 25% tax rate, you really only need about $230-$250 more in gross income every month, or about $3k per year. On an average household income of $60k (I&#039;ve used less), this means you only need to earn 5% more. I&#039;m not going to account for cost of living, as they&#039;re relatively comparable, and what&#039;s gained by no PST and cheaper fuel costs is probably offset elsewhere.

So ultimately, can you earn 5%+ more in Alberta than you can in Saskatchewan? Probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, &#8220;But with prices a full 25 percent higher even in a place like Calgary, I&#8217;m guessing their weekly wages aren&#8217;t 25 percent higher than Saskatoons.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a typical comparison, and generally inaccurate (not that I&#8217;m a fan of Calgary, necessarily, but just to be fair&#8230;) Take a $275k house vs. $344k house (+25% higher). Over 35 years @ 3.5% you get monthly payments of $1,132 (SK) and $1,415 (AB) respectively, which is a difference of only $283. The difference in income tax offsets this by about $100, so you&#8217;re down to $183. So at a 25% tax rate, you really only need about $230-$250 more in gross income every month, or about $3k per year. On an average household income of $60k (I&#8217;ve used less), this means you only need to earn 5% more. I&#8217;m not going to account for cost of living, as they&#8217;re relatively comparable, and what&#8217;s gained by no PST and cheaper fuel costs is probably offset elsewhere.</p>
<p>So ultimately, can you earn 5%+ more in Alberta than you can in Saskatchewan? Probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12380</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12380</guid>
		<description>You could be right Jason, the four thousand people likely includes family members, but still, that&#039;s a lot of new households.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could be right Jason, the four thousand people likely includes family members, but still, that&#8217;s a lot of new households.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12379</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12379</guid>
		<description>Mark, I think 4,000 &quot;people&quot; is probably more accurate, considering there were only 2,914 nominees (7,500 people) in 2008 and they were projecting 3,400 nominees (10,000 people) in 2009. So considering we&#039;re almost halfway through the year, I&#039;m think it&#039;s more like 1,000-1,500 new jobs + families/dependents.

&quot;Wow.  Where are they all going to live?  What affect could this possibly have on housing and the rental market?&quot; 70% in Regina and Saskatoon, apparently (not sure of the exact breakdown between cities). Exactly half of the categories don&#039;t lend themselves well towards increasing housing sales, though: Family members (sponsored by existing residents), Farm Operators (rural), Hospitality Sector (low-income) and Student (already here, debt). The rental market is an entirely different matter altogether (probably lower vacancies).

But it also comes down to affordability, and it&#039;s still widely out-of-reach for most at any of the average selling prices over the past 5 months.

Does this mean you&#039;ll be raising your rental rates Mark...? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I think 4,000 &#8220;people&#8221; is probably more accurate, considering there were only 2,914 nominees (7,500 people) in 2008 and they were projecting 3,400 nominees (10,000 people) in 2009. So considering we&#8217;re almost halfway through the year, I&#8217;m think it&#8217;s more like 1,000-1,500 new jobs + families/dependents.</p>
<p>&#8220;Wow.  Where are they all going to live?  What affect could this possibly have on housing and the rental market?&#8221; 70% in Regina and Saskatoon, apparently (not sure of the exact breakdown between cities). Exactly half of the categories don&#8217;t lend themselves well towards increasing housing sales, though: Family members (sponsored by existing residents), Farm Operators (rural), Hospitality Sector (low-income) and Student (already here, debt). The rental market is an entirely different matter altogether (probably lower vacancies).</p>
<p>But it also comes down to affordability, and it&#8217;s still widely out-of-reach for most at any of the average selling prices over the past 5 months.</p>
<p>Does this mean you&#8217;ll be raising your rental rates Mark&#8230;? <img src='http://www.teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12378</guid>
		<description>Thanks George.

&quot;We can&#039;t fix the weather but housing can become affordable again.&quot;

Global warming may yet save my rental venture:)

We also have to keep in mind that although housing prices seem to many here not to be affordable anymore, unless you are moving from Manitoba, Quebec, or Fredricton, they are cheaper.  (I know the weekly wages may be lower, though funny, weekly wages are higher here than Vancouver!)  

Average prices April 2009

Vancouver -565,000

Calgary - 371,000

Edmonton - 312,000

Toronto - 385,000

Ottawa - 298,000

even Hamilton - 286,000

Winnipeg is 212,000 and Quebec and parts of Maritimes are fairly cheap.

But with prices a full 25 percent higher even in a place like Calgary, I&#039;m guessing their weekly wages aren&#039;t 25 percent higher than Saskatoons.

So for someone selling in Ontario, BC, or Alberta, they&#039;ll likely be looking at a cheaper home then they were carrying before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks George.</p>
<p>&#8220;We can&#8217;t fix the weather but housing can become affordable again.&#8221;</p>
<p>Global warming may yet save my rental venture:)</p>
<p>We also have to keep in mind that although housing prices seem to many here not to be affordable anymore, unless you are moving from Manitoba, Quebec, or Fredricton, they are cheaper.  (I know the weekly wages may be lower, though funny, weekly wages are higher here than Vancouver!)  </p>
<p>Average prices April 2009</p>
<p>Vancouver -565,000</p>
<p>Calgary &#8211; 371,000</p>
<p>Edmonton &#8211; 312,000</p>
<p>Toronto &#8211; 385,000</p>
<p>Ottawa &#8211; 298,000</p>
<p>even Hamilton &#8211; 286,000</p>
<p>Winnipeg is 212,000 and Quebec and parts of Maritimes are fairly cheap.</p>
<p>But with prices a full 25 percent higher even in a place like Calgary, I&#8217;m guessing their weekly wages aren&#8217;t 25 percent higher than Saskatoons.</p>
<p>So for someone selling in Ontario, BC, or Alberta, they&#8217;ll likely be looking at a cheaper home then they were carrying before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crikey</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12377</link>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12377</guid>
		<description>&quot;clearly Sask. is likely still attracting more people than are leaving&quot;

I think you&#039;re right, Mark. Hubby is often on trips trying to woo people to our fair province, and anecdotally there is a huge amount of interest. Interestingly, hiring has not slowed down for them at all (health care).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;clearly Sask. is likely still attracting more people than are leaving&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right, Mark. Hubby is often on trips trying to woo people to our fair province, and anecdotally there is a huge amount of interest. Interestingly, hiring has not slowed down for them at all (health care).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12376</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12376</guid>
		<description>Mark,

this company has excellent management if you are a bond holder but for a worker, management seems almost like communism.  But maybe Marx was right.  I hope this rumor is false.

There are many factors to why housing is doing so well right now.  Low interest rates, high rental rates( seen kijji lately?) but there is also a ton of confidence for this province overall.  More people moving here and less people moving away.  I have always said that this is the place to be with all our resources and the right government and in the future I am very optimistic for the province.

The benefits of inexpensive housing are huge. With our economy and the bright future, there should be literally thousands from Ontario coming here.  But if anyone every reads the blogs, it is always the same thing.  &quot;Housing is too expensive here and the cold winters.&quot;  We can&#039;t fix the weather but housing can become affordable again.  It is well on its way.  

I do enjoy your comments Mark, you keep the blog balanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>this company has excellent management if you are a bond holder but for a worker, management seems almost like communism.  But maybe Marx was right.  I hope this rumor is false.</p>
<p>There are many factors to why housing is doing so well right now.  Low interest rates, high rental rates( seen kijji lately?) but there is also a ton of confidence for this province overall.  More people moving here and less people moving away.  I have always said that this is the place to be with all our resources and the right government and in the future I am very optimistic for the province.</p>
<p>The benefits of inexpensive housing are huge. With our economy and the bright future, there should be literally thousands from Ontario coming here.  But if anyone every reads the blogs, it is always the same thing.  &#8220;Housing is too expensive here and the cold winters.&#8221;  We can&#8217;t fix the weather but housing can become affordable again.  It is well on its way.  </p>
<p>I do enjoy your comments Mark, you keep the blog balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12375</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12375</guid>
		<description>&quot;In this story from the June 3 SP, says we can expect 10,000 international immigrants to settle in Saskatchewan in the next 12-18 months. Applications are up 53%&quot;

Wow.  Where are they all going to live?  What affect could this possibly have on housing and the rental market?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In this story from the June 3 SP, says we can expect 10,000 international immigrants to settle in Saskatchewan in the next 12-18 months. Applications are up 53%&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow.  Where are they all going to live?  What affect could this possibly have on housing and the rental market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12388</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12388</guid>
		<description>Interesting Mark.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestarphoenix.com/Norris+disputes+forecasts/1657234/story.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This story from the June 3 SP&lt;/a&gt;, says we can expect 10,000 international immigrants to settle in Saskatchewan in the next 12-18 months. Applications are up 53%.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting Mark.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thestarphoenix.com/Norris+disputes+forecasts/1657234/story.html" rel="nofollow">This story from the June 3 SP</a>, says we can expect 10,000 international immigrants to settle in Saskatchewan in the next 12-18 months. Applications are up 53%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12374</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12374</guid>
		<description>On the job numbers, I know a few on here like to think of all the housing demand this spring as being artificially propped up by low interest rates, but clearly Sask. is likely still attracting more people than are leaving.  In addition, someone in government told me the other day that 4000 new international immigrants arrived in Sask over the past several months, all with secured jobs, numbers he say that haven&#039;t been taken into account by CMHC etc, in their predictions for housing, rents etc.

George, corportate greed, really, or good management?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the job numbers, I know a few on here like to think of all the housing demand this spring as being artificially propped up by low interest rates, but clearly Sask. is likely still attracting more people than are leaving.  In addition, someone in government told me the other day that 4000 new international immigrants arrived in Sask over the past several months, all with secured jobs, numbers he say that haven&#8217;t been taken into account by CMHC etc, in their predictions for housing, rents etc.</p>
<p>George, corportate greed, really, or good management?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crikey</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12373</link>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12373</guid>
		<description>Job loss numbers nationally are looking nasty (an 11-year high), which is not unexpected given the state of the auto industry:

http://tinyurl.com/pcl7rw

SK and MB, however... appear to have added employment:

&quot;Manitoba and Saskatchewan added employment in May with gains of 3,900 and 3,100 respectively. Both provinces had an unemployment rate of 4.9%, the lowest in the country, and are the only two provinces with an increase in employment since last October.&quot;

Go Sask!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Job loss numbers nationally are looking nasty (an 11-year high), which is not unexpected given the state of the auto industry:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/pcl7rw" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/pcl7rw</a></p>
<p>SK and MB, however&#8230; appear to have added employment:</p>
<p>&#8220;Manitoba and Saskatchewan added employment in May with gains of 3,900 and 3,100 respectively. Both provinces had an unemployment rate of 4.9%, the lowest in the country, and are the only two provinces with an increase in employment since last October.&#8221;</p>
<p>Go Sask!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12372</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12372</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

anything credible to that rumour?

Speaking of rumors, I have heard of a BIG North American company will be downsizing if the economy does not pick in the next few months.  And this is even though they made a sizable profit in Q1 2009. Corporate greed at its finest I may add. It would affect Saskatoon and no, it is not a lowpaying company like Walmart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>anything credible to that rumour?</p>
<p>Speaking of rumors, I have heard of a BIG North American company will be downsizing if the economy does not pick in the next few months.  And this is even though they made a sizable profit in Q1 2009. Corporate greed at its finest I may add. It would affect Saskatoon and no, it is not a lowpaying company like Walmart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12371</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12371</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hey, someone said my name…&quot;

Lol. Google alerts, or are you actually that close?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hey, someone said my name…&#8221;</p>
<p>Lol. Google alerts, or are you actually that close?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12370</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12370</guid>
		<description>Rumour: Nuclear Plant will go north of Beatty - big transmission lines presently going through there from Nipawin and EB Campbell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumour: Nuclear Plant will go north of Beatty &#8211; big transmission lines presently going through there from Nipawin and EB Campbell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12369</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12369</guid>
		<description>Crikey,

mish&#039;s blog is one of my favorites.  He is a big advocate of deflation.   Calculated risk is another good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crikey,</p>
<p>mish&#8217;s blog is one of my favorites.  He is a big advocate of deflation.   Calculated risk is another good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrochest</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12368</link>
		<dc:creator>jrochest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12368</guid>
		<description>Hey, someone said my name...

&quot;Jason,

&quot;many of us have been calling for lows in the $200k-range&quot;

I know you&#039;ve suggested it, and jrochest has as well but I think two is still &quot;a couple of us,&quot; not &quot;many of us.&quot; :)&quot;

I think Crikey and some of the other grizzlies around here were saying the same thing...

And I am surprised at the price stability: interest rates have something to do with it, and the spring market -- but I expected much, much higher inventory and much greater pressure on prices.

But inventory is still very high, and sales aren&#039;t great: it&#039;s just that last April was when sales fell off a cliff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, someone said my name&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Jason,</p>
<p>&#8220;many of us have been calling for lows in the $200k-range&#8221;</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;ve suggested it, and jrochest has as well but I think two is still &#8220;a couple of us,&#8221; not &#8220;many of us.&#8221; <img src='http://www.teamfisher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221;</p>
<p>I think Crikey and some of the other grizzlies around here were saying the same thing&#8230;</p>
<p>And I am surprised at the price stability: interest rates have something to do with it, and the spring market &#8212; but I expected much, much higher inventory and much greater pressure on prices.</p>
<p>But inventory is still very high, and sales aren&#8217;t great: it&#8217;s just that last April was when sales fell off a cliff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Chartist</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12367</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Chartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12367</guid>
		<description>The Federal Reserve has done a brilliant job of pumping money to the primary dealers to support the stock market and commodities and the media is running with it with all this optimism. Unfortunately, trouble lingers in the background.

Keep an eye on those bond yields. If the supply keeps on coming like it is, the bond vigilantes are going to sell sell sell. Result = A continuation of increasing rates, killing the mortgage market in the process. I&#039;m not a doom and gloomer, but this stuff that is coming down the pike is serious business.

I don&#039;t know about Canada, but in the US, the mortgage market is in complete chaos because of the events of th past two weeks. And once the auctions start next week, it will probably get worse. Again, watch those yields (US 10-year yield especially).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Reserve has done a brilliant job of pumping money to the primary dealers to support the stock market and commodities and the media is running with it with all this optimism. Unfortunately, trouble lingers in the background.</p>
<p>Keep an eye on those bond yields. If the supply keeps on coming like it is, the bond vigilantes are going to sell sell sell. Result = A continuation of increasing rates, killing the mortgage market in the process. I&#8217;m not a doom and gloomer, but this stuff that is coming down the pike is serious business.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about Canada, but in the US, the mortgage market is in complete chaos because of the events of th past two weeks. And once the auctions start next week, it will probably get worse. Again, watch those yields (US 10-year yield especially).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12366</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12366</guid>
		<description>Steven, you have chill out a bit. lol . I&#039;m actually a bear but Jason was asking for clarification on MACD.  I guess it&#039;s hard to hear tone of voice on a forum but i wasn&#039;t disputing your MACD.  I was simply pointing out you should never make trades on just one indicator, especially not with stocks.  But I do agree it is much better than just going with gut feeling.

In calgary we&#039;ve seen a surge in prices lately and surprisingly lots of sold signs.  I strongly feel everything is way overpriced but it seems sentiment and low interest rates are stronger than the other factors right now.  In fact, i told my friends not to buy right now and they might end up hating me as prices keep ticking up.  This is why i&#039;m surprised to hear so many people are saying Saskatoon is in a bit of a lul right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, you have chill out a bit. lol . I&#8217;m actually a bear but Jason was asking for clarification on MACD.  I guess it&#8217;s hard to hear tone of voice on a forum but i wasn&#8217;t disputing your MACD.  I was simply pointing out you should never make trades on just one indicator, especially not with stocks.  But I do agree it is much better than just going with gut feeling.</p>
<p>In calgary we&#8217;ve seen a surge in prices lately and surprisingly lots of sold signs.  I strongly feel everything is way overpriced but it seems sentiment and low interest rates are stronger than the other factors right now.  In fact, i told my friends not to buy right now and they might end up hating me as prices keep ticking up.  This is why i&#8217;m surprised to hear so many people are saying Saskatoon is in a bit of a lul right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.teamfisher.com/saskatoon-residential-real-estate-sales-on-par-with-may-2008-in-may-2009-srar/#comment-12365</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normfisher.ca/?p=3786#comment-12365</guid>
		<description>Steven, I&#039;m not sure it would necessarily matter how many different indicators you would post, there&#039;s still a lot of &quot;denial&quot; (and not the river in Egypt). I think it&#039;s clear that prices peaked last year, and the only factors really keeping the average selling price artificially high) are: a) unrealistically low mortgage rates allowing many first-time homebuyers to buy (who may not have qualified otherwise), b) the fact that we&#039;re selling more houses than condominiums (which tend to be more expensive) and c) limited inventory in certain price points which (combined with low interest rates) are probably pushing some buyers into more expensive properties.

Crikey, I think 15% is probably more realistic (possibly 10% for houses in the &quot;demand&quot; price points; probably 20% for higher-end homes). Yes, the &#039;captcha&#039; filter seems to have developed some NC-17 tendencies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, I&#8217;m not sure it would necessarily matter how many different indicators you would post, there&#8217;s still a lot of &#8220;denial&#8221; (and not the river in Egypt). I think it&#8217;s clear that prices peaked last year, and the only factors really keeping the average selling price artificially high) are: a) unrealistically low mortgage rates allowing many first-time homebuyers to buy (who may not have qualified otherwise), b) the fact that we&#8217;re selling more houses than condominiums (which tend to be more expensive) and c) limited inventory in certain price points which (combined with low interest rates) are probably pushing some buyers into more expensive properties.</p>
<p>Crikey, I think 15% is probably more realistic (possibly 10% for houses in the &#8220;demand&#8221; price points; probably 20% for higher-end homes). Yes, the &#8216;captcha&#8217; filter seems to have developed some NC-17 tendencies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
