Welcome to Saskatoon Real Estate Resource Centre Blog Sign in | Help
Saskatoon real estate: Week in review (April 14-18)

The inventory of Saskatoon real estate listings grew again for the sixth consecutive week moving from 619 last week to 668 by the close of business on Friday. 167 properties were offered for sale including 120 single-family homes (houses) and 41 condominiums. The total numbers of properties available in each of those categories sits at 423 and 188 respectively, significantly higher than last year but still a drop in the bucket compared to other Canadian markets.

 

Unit sales were definitely on the soft side for what should be a prime spring week. 70 homes (houses and condos) were reported sold, compared to 118 for the same week last year. There are an additional 85 residential properties on the Saskatoon Multiple Listing Service reported as “conditionally sold,” which is up about 30% from last week.

 

In spite of rising inventories, it seems that seller’s are still perceived to have the advantages, though not nearly as much as they had at this time last year. For the same week in 2007, nearly 70% of home sales were showing above list price sales to the tune of $23,000 on average. This past week, the percentage of homes going above the asking price was closer to 40% and the average overbid was shy of $16,000. Approximately 40% of all sales sold for less than the asking price and the average underbid was $8,818.

 

Average selling prices remained remarkably high at $318,584, the second strongest weekly price on record, topped just once before, the week of March 30-April 4.

Saskatoon real estate: Week in review (April 14-18)

Nationally, the media took a sudden and sharp turn as the Globe and Mail reported that sales had “tumbled in all major cities this winter” and that listings had “surged” in Western Canada. With that, Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist at BMO Nesbitt Burns declared Canada’s housing boom “officially over.” As a follow up, economists argued about whether or not Canadian real estate will suffer a similar fate to what’s being experienced in the US. One veteran real estate sales official from Vancouver wondered aloud if the “fat lady” is about to sing.

 

Meanwhile, Fraser Beach quotes the Toronto Real Estate Board reporting an improving market through the first half of April, reaching numbers just 5% below those recorded in the first half of April 2007. Sheldon and Sara in Edmonton report the strongest sales week in six months. In Calgary, price reductions seem to be the topic of discussion, but my friends in St. John report strong performance for unit sales and price gains through Q1.

 

Confused yet?

 

Real estate has always been subject to local economic conditions, and it likely always will be. While good news for Saskatchewan continues to capture attention nationwide, we should be aware that listings are trending up and sales numbers are starting to weaken some.

 

Saskatoon has outperformed almost every market in North America over the past 18 months, and we’re well ahead of the rest of Saskatchewan when it comes to price gains. Some would suggest that Saskatoon house prices have blasted ahead of the rest of our vibrant economy. I think it’s hard to disagree. Regardless of where you stand, there should be little doubt that we have hit the affordability ceiling in Saskatoon and that the pressure should be coming off of real estate prices. Perhaps it could be worse, but it’s probably high time that buyers saw a little relief in the Saskatoon real estate market. I think that homes will continue to sell in the months ahead but sellers should be aware that the game is about to change. We’re not going the way of the U.S. but it might be time to break out your negotiating hat.

 

Keep in mind that I don’t have any special insights or crystal balls. These are my opinions, and I’ve missed the mark before, but that’s the way I see it today.

 

This post was edited for errors on 4/20/08 at 7:40 PM.

 

Geographic boundaries of “areas” defined

Process of data collection and calculation

 

I’m always happy to answer your Saskatoon real estate questions.  Feel free to drop me an email.

 

Norm Fisher

Royal LePage Saskatoon Real Estate

 

Posted: Sunday, April 20, 2008 3:16 PM by Norm Fisher

Comments

Vinny said:

Does anybody know if there is a website for Regina stats and blogs?

I have several friends there that tell me it's still booming but I'd like to see the stats for myself. Thanks

# April 20, 2008 4:52 PM

Jim said:

Well Vinny beat me to the first comment, however, kind of affirms the trend we've all seen.  There are continually more houses and less sales, maybe not enough to say crash yet, but definitely more of a buyer's market, with more listings available.  Also, this is again considering that other areas in the country, previously more expensive are now more affordable for housing.  So ever increasing inventory and declining demand, some price correction in Saskatoon is coming, just difficult to decide when.  

I would agree with Norm on the media's sudden turn nationally, and think that's kind of what we're waiting for in Saskatoon, an honest media report to come out and say the market is over priced and the boom is done.  People here seem to believe whatever's on the news.  Do we really think our economy doubled since spring 2006 when our population was at a nadir?  At that time there were still lots of good jobs, but it wasn't cool to move here.  Now it is.  Regardless that not much has changed in the last 2 years, except for doubling house prices, as soon as the media starts telling us to sell at the peak, we'll see an increase in sales of speculators.  And maybe as a group we should stop putting so much weight on what TV or the paper tells us.

# April 20, 2008 5:07 PM

Grant said:

Like I said in the Boom is Over comments, bid under asking price, there are a lot of similar homes available and buyers just need to show some patience.  Each week we see there are more available.  If we all show some patience and didn't bid over anything for a couple weeks, I'm sure prices would go down pretty quick.  And with more houses available, it's not like we're going to miss out.

# April 20, 2008 5:24 PM

Heather D. said:

ROCK AND ROLL!!!  :'D

Norm,

When you say our number of listings is a "drop in the bucket" compared to other cities, aren't we getting closer to a "normal" inventory for our population size?  Many other cities are also oversaturated with listings.  It'd be interesting to see a direct ratio.

# April 20, 2008 5:32 PM

Larry Yatkowsky said:

Norm,

Thanks for the link-love .>)

Vinny you are on the best blog in Saskatoon.  Norm has it all and posts the stats regularly.  

# April 20, 2008 5:40 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Jim,

Good points. I think the reason why you're not seeing that in our media yet is that it would be difficult to write a credible story which said, "it's over." While I see things moving in that direction, we still have a way to go. It's easy to compare April 2008 to April 2007 and say it looks bad, but it's all a matter of perspective. Take the last two weeks and plant them on a calendar anytime prior to 2006 and we've just seen something truly amazing. 40% of all sales going over list price by an average of $15K plus. This is not a bust story yet.

Heather,

I did mean it in terms of "over saturation." For instance, Edmonton has a population of 1,100,000 (?) and they have 7,000 listings. We're a fifth of the size and have less than one tenth the number of properties for sale. Still a pretty big imbalance. Again, I think when our inventory reached 1000-1200 units we probably have some pretty good opportunities developing for buyers. I won't be the least bit surprised if we find those numbers by the end of summer. I think though that the price gains are finished for now.

Vinny,

I don't know of a source for that in Regina but I'll crunch you some numbers for Regina a little later and post them here.

Grant,

Good idea to proceed with care. No matter how you look at it, you are shopping this market at record price levels.

# April 20, 2008 5:52 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Vinny,

Some Regina stuff for you. Month, unit sales, average price (all residential within Regina).

Jan, 07 - 146 @ 117,406

Feb, 07 - 219 @ 134,174

Mar, 08 - 314 @ 143,282

Apr, 07 - 313 @ 159,187

May, 07 - 397 @ 175,538

Jun, 07 - 363 @ 183,469

Jul, 07 - 332 @ 187,120

Aug, 07 - 341 @ 182,177

Sep, 07 - 254 @ 196,320

Oct, 07 - 271 @ 195,308

Nov, 07 - 249 @ 182,013

Dec, 07 - 182 @ 207,145

Jan, 08 - 225 @ 204,007

Feb, 08 - 233 @ 222,162

Mar, 08 - 266 @ 234,512

Apr, 08 - 204 @ 250,440

In March, 173 of 266 homes (65%) sold above asking price by an average of $6,624.

To date in April, 74 of 204 (36%) homes sold above asking price by an average of $11,975.

# April 20, 2008 6:59 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Heather,

Just thinking about your question. We are more into "normal" territory for sure and I think that the level we're at probably makes it difficult for prices to increase much, if at all. Sellers who add $10,000 to the most recent sales when pricing their homes are likely to be disappointed. Being below recent sales, just a smidge, is probably the smart strategy right now, and if we get to 1000-1200 I suspect we'll see some priced more than a smidge under.

# April 20, 2008 7:05 PM

Heather D. said:

Sweet.  Here comes the sun, and I say it's all right.  :')

# April 20, 2008 7:59 PM

Jim said:

Norm is famous: http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/business/story.html?id=ce63aeff-bc20-4483-b0d2-1dd207a82e90

I must have missed this at the time, but apparently even local main stream media are allowing questioning the fundamentals of the Saskatoon market.  Far from calling it "Saskabust" yet - but still raising some serious questions on how we can possibly justify higher prices than elsewhere.  And why is Regina so much cheaper (over $100, 000 cheaper? by Norm's numbers above)?  It has the same kind of jobs (actually a bit higher paying on average), has oil and gas type stuff based there, and an adequate university.  Saskatoon just wins in riverness (though Wascana Park is beautiful in the summer) and having a less sleazy mayor.

If we're going to pretend Saskatoon prices are up on the strength of the provincial economy, Regina should be on par (Granted Regina has historically been cheaper) with it's oil upgrader, an actual gas company downtown and proximity to other potash mines and gas and such.

# April 20, 2008 8:28 PM

Wesco said:

Dam norm you are famous, the Starphoenix

# April 20, 2008 8:33 PM

Ron said:

My thought is that prices will continue to increase albeit at a slower rate than we have seen. I say this because (1) the economy is still strong (2) the supply/demand equation is not out of wack and (3) interest rates are headed lower for the next year. I say 10-15% for the next couple of years.

# April 20, 2008 8:45 PM

Heather D. said:

Jim,

I disagree, I'd rather have Pat Fiacco as a mayor... or some sort of typewriting primate... or even an intelligent mollusc!  Who voted Atch in, not once, but twice!?  Maybe a lot of people were rooting for that glass dome downtown?  All they got were $500K Christmas lights.  Tsk tsk.  I suppose between him and Pankiw he was the lesser of two evils.

# April 20, 2008 9:15 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Jim and Wesco,

Thanks. My position with Royal LePage includes "media spokesperson" responsibilites so I have had a number of opportunities to speak with Star Phoenix reporters. To their credit, they have published my comments on affordability in the last four or five stories that they've spoken to me for. I think they get it. In fact, the story that Joanne wrote came from her own feeling that things have gotten a bit wacky.

I am also befuddled about the differences between Saskatoon and Regina though the difference is probably far closer to $50K than $100K.

Ron,

Hope your wrong but I've been amazed more than once by this wacky market.

# April 20, 2008 9:55 PM

Jim said:

Maybe I should have clarified, a guy who owns a men's clothing store and shows up at events without a belt (shirt tucked in) will never get my vote - That said, as a former City of Regina employee (left for better opportunity, not fired), I can never endorse Fiacco, he is truly a sleezeball to levels the general public will never comprehend until under his employ.  His 90% plus approval rating, despite the highest crime and violent crime rates in Canada, unhappy employees and really the fact that he, like Atch, are just on cruise control given the economy, will always baffle me.  I think people just like a smiling face, regardless of what's under neath.

And Norm, I was pretty sure Royal LePage's own survey pegged Regina at $100,000 less than Saskatoon.  And the higher wages in Regina than Saskatoon are a couple years old, but I'm assuming still accurate.

# April 20, 2008 11:13 PM

Ron said:

Thanks for the Regina stats, Norm. I am one of the bulls on this thread but all of the numbers point to rising not falling prices in Saskatchewan generally. Asides from potash and wheat, higher energy prices are fueling the "Saskaboom". I see oil hit a new high in overseas trading today thanks to talk of a long term production peak in Russia and a new announcement from OPEC that they will not increase production. Of course, this brings us to the "next" big oil fields in the world: one is in Brazil offshore and a mile under the seabed. The second is the Bakkan formation right here in Saskatchewan which could eclipse the Alaskan North Slope in terms of production. I've been reading that commercial exploitation techniques tailored to develop this field are just about ready to go and within 5 years things could be up and running. That brings up the subject of Regina which is actually closer than Saskatoon to the upcoming Bakkan oil fields. Regina might show a stronger real estate market than Saskatoon going forward. Does anyone have any thoughts on that?

# April 20, 2008 11:21 PM

Heather D. said:

Jim,

Oh my, he does sound as bad as Atch!  LoL

A lot of Albertans too thought, regarding Ralph Klein, that a monkey dressed in a suit could have led them into that boom, it didn't matter who was at the helm.  I'm going to say the same for SK.  :')  Of course, if not managed properly the grass can turn brown PDQ.

Ron,

Numbers of slower sales and rising inventory point towards a buyer's market.  While I'm one of the bears, I don't see how Saskatoon prices are going to rise (substantially) if wages aren't increasing at a decent rate.  Only the big wigs initially will be making a pretty penny off this "Saskaboom", not the average Joe.  As observed, real estate has taken off before any real SK economy boom is present.  Saskatoon could "truly" boom and I still don't think we'll see much more for price increases this year since the market seems to be maxed out for many entry level buyers.

# April 21, 2008 3:00 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Ron,

Thanks for the comment. So, who do you see as the primary active buyer then as we move forward from here. Consumers, speculators?

# April 21, 2008 6:30 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Jim,

Royal LePage reports on specific property types in specific areas and the "averages" they quote often don't reflect the entire market accurately, in my opinion. I know that there are also some weaknesses using the overall average selling price of all homes but I think it probably paints a closer to accurate picture.

# April 21, 2008 6:33 AM

Dan said:

I don't understand how Ron is so bullish on SK.  I mean if it is all about oil, Edmonton is a big service centre for oil and gas and oil sands and like everyone else on here keeps pointing out, people in Edmonton seem to make way more, and their property values are falling, since they exceeded affordibility and supply caught up and are now less than Saskatoon.  

Maybe Edmonton has an over supply, but really, in terms of moving to a city, why would new residents move to Saskatoon when they can make more in a similar but bigger city while living in a cheaper house, thanks to the over supply in Edmonton?  I think until Saskatoon actually wages actually beat Calgary, or Edmonton, or even Regina (some one else on here), there is no real reason for prices to go up and no real reason for people to move here, other than relatives or friends living here.

I think the Alberta Advantage just got huge, all that held them back from crushing Sask before was that it used to be more expensive to buy a house in Alberta before.  All the things like higher wages, more job opportunities (especially for trained professionals like engineers or scientists), a better university and proximity to BC/mountains still exist that initially drew people west - now with comparitively cheaper housing.  I wouldn't move back to Saskatoon to take a pay cut, live in a smaller house and endure even colder temperatures, and some one on here said it leads the country in violent crime, is that true?  "Saskaboom" as everyone calls it just doesn't make sense.  

I would have thought about retiring back there, some time in the distant future, but with the assumption I could gain something on the move, just not worth it if I'm losing.

# April 21, 2008 10:31 PM

david said:

People continue to say "the economy is strong" in Saskatchewan, so house prices will not crash.  But our house prices have doubled and our economy has not.  The booming economy which is to come has already been priced into the real estate market.  This is a part of what made it go out.  

When people hear something wonderful is going to happen to "X" in 5 years, they don't wait 5 years to invest in it.  They invest in it now, before the actual reason to invest.  That "good news" of our diamonds, oil, etc is already priced into the market is it not?

# April 21, 2008 11:09 PM

david said:

My question is: Who are buying now?  And why?

# April 21, 2008 11:17 PM

Heather D. said:

David,

I agree that Saskatoon's house market has led the way for a boom, now we're just waiting for that boom.

# April 22, 2008 12:05 AM

Ron said:

I actually think the hydrocarbon future is not in Alberta but in Saskatchewan. Alberta's conventional oil and gas production is in decline and the tar sands stuff is hugely expensive and environmentally devastating to move out of the ground. I've been following where the next oil projects are going to be and they are more likely to be in Saskatchewan rather than Alberta. The Bakken is actually light oil and with new techniques of horizontal drilling, the cost of production will be way less than the tar sands of Alberta. The amount of oil in the Bakken formation is also huge - several times that of the Alaskan North Slope which surprised me when I studied the subject. Aside from the Brazilian discovery of oil a mile below the seabed, the Bakken is THE next oil frontier in the world. Companies are already moving in and I believe that in 5 years, Saskatchewan's cities (Regina in particular given it is on the front line of the Bakkan field) will be oil centres. If you were a major oil company what would you do? Pour more money into the tar sands where production costs are extremely high and rising by the day or invest in easier light oil that has a lower production cost. I think the answer is obvious!  

# April 22, 2008 12:42 AM

Ron said:

I should also address the point of who the purchasers will be going forward. Up to now, I agree that speculators - many from out of town are big driving forces in the prices increases at least initially. But speculation is a form of information on a market. If the prices are going up - what does that say about the future? It could indicate confidence from investors in the future.

Going forward, aside from new resource projects which certainly are in the planning stage, we know that the Saskatchewan government's take from taxes and royalties is steadily climbing. This money will be funneled back into the economy in the form of infrastructure spending, higher salaries for (more) government workers and possibly tax reduction - all things which stimulate a local economy and gets the multiplier effect going as the money gets put back into the economy. We then have a virtuous (feedback) cycle taking the economy and eventually wages - higher. This will be supportive of real estate prices in the medium term, I believe.

# April 22, 2008 12:54 AM

George said:

I have been following Edmonton's market for quite some time.

Average Single Family House in Edmonton is around 385k while in Saskatoon it is around 330k

Average Household Income in Edmonton is 85k

Saskatoon is 70k.

So why is Edmonton staying around 385k while Saskatoon is closing the gap?

Supply and demand.

Saskatoon only has around 700 properties for sale.  We need something like 2500 listings for some sensibility in this market. We need an oversupply of listings, maybe even more than that number. That may sound like a lot but take a look at this website for Edmonton listings.  Tell me that there were no speculators in Edmonton the last couple of years.

http://www.polarissells.com/search_mls_map_form1.php

# April 22, 2008 9:46 AM

George said:

Heather D.,

Here are some approx numbers

Phoenix, 1 listing per 60 people

4 mill people  66000 listings

Edmonton 1 listing per 71 people

1 mill people 14000 listings

Saskatoon 1 listing per 321 people

225,000 people  700 listings

My numbers are not precise but pretty close to get an idea of things.

I believe we need a tonne of listings to get some decency in this market.  We have a bit to go yet.

# April 22, 2008 12:00 PM

Heather D. said:

George,

I think if we saw an average listing of 1000 we'll have a lot more balance.  Phoenix and Edmonton are both oversaturated markets.  Thanks for those numbers, it gives one a sense of what's going on.  :')

# April 22, 2008 2:18 PM

Jim said:

So what if Saskatoon lacks supply?  Simply Edmonton does not lack supply, probably is actully cheaper, is a similar city, and if we believe George's income numbers, the average household there out earns Saskatoon by $15,000 a year!  If you really want to live in Saskatoon, yeah lack of housing, but the making 15,000 more a year, in cheaper housing in Edmonton should negate available housing here.  After all if housing is available everywhere else, and you can make 15,000 more a year, who cares if housing is available here, just move to those other places.

# April 22, 2008 7:57 PM

david said:

Canada's second largest oil producer.

It leads the world in uranium.

Home of the world's biggest potash producer, the most valuable company on the Toronto stock exchange.

Diamonds?  Yup.  We have them too apparently.  

Bread.  Does the world need bread?

Sure, economically we will do well, but will these things above lead to a massive influx of people, and will this be happening in the next few months?  

I believe in the next 5-10 years, house prices here will be very high.  But right now, I'm not so sure.

# April 23, 2008 12:42 AM

Norm Fisher said:

George,

To the best of my knowledge there are no real current "household income" numbers. I think the most recent are from 2005. StatsCan did releases some average weekly incomes in January 2008 which pegged that number at 743, which was up about 10% (I believe) from the previous year. Using that figure, the average household income is a little better than $77,000 in Saskatchewan. Doug Elliot from SaskTrends recently commented that we've seem good growth through Q1/08 but I don't recall any specifics being put out there.

Love to hear from some business owners or administrators on the current income trend in your business.

There's been lots of talk about certain jobs doing well, while others at the lower end of the spectrum aren't. My son will be on his summer break soon. We're seeing lots more opportunities, many at 50% higher than what he made last summer.

It will be interesting to see an update on these numbers from StatsCan.

I think that 2500 listings would send us in the other direction. We saw about 4500 resales last year so 2500 listings would be abut a 7 month supply, not a fun environment to sell in.

# April 23, 2008 6:42 AM

George said:

The numbers I had were from a report from the website http://www.canadianbusiness.com/rankings/bestplacestolive/list.jsp

I believe the study was done about a year and a half ago.  But the average household income was just an estimate.

I know that we have experienced the biggest growth in wages since.  I see that trend continueing in the next few years.

# April 23, 2008 9:27 AM

Jim said:

Wouldn't be surprised if Saskatoon incomes were below average though - Regina is traditionally a few thousand higher per earner, so if average is 77,000 wouldn't be surprised if across a couple earners Saskatoon was lower, say 70,000 like George said.  Fits with the numbers you usually hear floated by media.

# April 24, 2008 5:55 PM

Jim said:

George, that was an interesting article.  I find it interesting that Saskatoon came in 16 th, back when housing was more affordable ... since at that time we already had low unemployment, I'm assuming we're dropping spots as discretionary income goes down with increasing housing costs.

# April 24, 2008 5:58 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Jim,

According to StatsCan, median family incomes in 2005 were about 8% lower than Regina, but about 5% above the national average.

http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/famil107a.htm

Not sure what happened in 2006 but I know Saskatchewan showed the highest income growth between Dec. 2006 and Dec. 2007. Correction to my comment above. Average family incomes in Saskatchewan rose 5.4% during that period to 743 a week. Nationally, the rate of income growth was 3.1%.

http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/080226/d080226c.htm

# April 24, 2008 6:34 PM

Conrad said:

I had heard on the TV news recently that Alberta, percentage wise, once again led the nation in income growth, although it was only about 0.1 or 0.2% more than Sask in increase.  Still, starting from a higher base, so after, Alberta actually gained slight ground on Sask wages, and they make even more, slightly, than we do.  So if George's numbers are right, and in Edmonton, a family made $15,000 more a year, now they likely make $15,015 more in Edmonton a year than in Saskatoon.

8% lower wages in Saskatoon than Regina seem like a pretty significant difference, especially since their houses are a lot cheaper than anywhere.  Maybe I'll add Regina to Edmonton in places to consider moving to.

# April 26, 2008 2:46 AM

Kenton said:

Yeah, I remember that too we were second or something but Alberta wages increase more than everyone else I think even now.  At least that's what was on the news.  Number 2 isn't bad if it keeps going up at 2nd most.

# April 26, 2008 11:22 AM

david said:

"People here seem to believe whatever's on the news."

I agree with this comment.  People generally follow a herd mentality.  Because there was so much optimism built into the market, any pessimistic message from an authority could cause the spark.  

The reason for me being on this blog is I just want some all knowing person to tell me what house prices are going to do.  

It seems most involved have either agenda's (realtors) or biases based on wishful thinking. (home owners and people who want to be home owners.)

So it's hard to trust.  If just a couple people start getting scared...  that's all it takes.  They lower their prices.  Their neighbors who are selling see that and lower their prices.  Then, the rest of the people with those empty houses decide it's time to bail....  

Unless, unless, migration continues, which is completely possible, given our very population, only a few moving in can make a drastic difference.

# April 26, 2008 3:26 PM

Saskatoon Real Estate Resource Centre Blog said:

Following a few weeks of unseasonably sluggish home sales, the Saskatoon real estate market took an upward

# April 26, 2008 6:24 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required) 

 

Comment Notification

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS