Welcome to Saskatoon Real Estate Resource Centre Blog Sign in | Help
Saskatoon House Prices Higher Than Edmonton
Royal LePage House Price Survey for the first quarter of 2008

Canada’s real estate markets remain on stable footing according to a Royal LePage House Price Survey released this week. “With the notable exception of a handful of small western cities, the country has returned to an environment characterized by moderate price increases,” said Phil Soper, president and chief executive for Royal LePage Real Estate Services.

 

Outside of Saskatchewan, all markets reported modest increases over the first quarter of 2008 except Edmonton, which showed a decline of 7.7% in the cost of a standard condo, a 4.9% drop in the cost of an average bungalow and a decline of 3.7% in the cost of a standard two-storey.

 

Aggressive price gains in Saskatoon measured against depreciation in Edmonton left Saskatoon homes costing slightly more than those in Edmonton, according to the report. This is a little tough to believe given the still hefty gap in average sale prices reported by the Canadian Real Estate Association for the two cities.

 

Regardless, there’s little question that Saskatoon and Saskatchewan continue to be under the spotlight for extraordinary gains, but the news is not all peaches and cream. “The Saskatchewan market will take care of itself the same way that the Edmonton market did last year by simply pricing people out of the market. The unsustainable price increases we saw in the first quarter won’t last,” warns Soper. “As places like Saskatoon take care of that affordable housing picture, the rate of appreciation will come down quite dramatically.”

 

I understand how Phil feels. I characterized 2008 as a potential “tipping point” for Saskatoon real estate during a recent interview with Murray Lyons at the Saskatoon Star Phoenix in which I openly shared my concerns around deteriorating affordability in Saskatoon housing. When the average family income can’t support a mortgage on an average family home you have to wonder how much further things can go.

 

Another noteworthy report is RBC’s Provincial Outlook released this week. RBC Economics remains bullish on the Saskatchewan economy but issued some stern warnings about the real estate market. “Saskatchewan ranks number-one across all key housing indicators we track. House prices became overvalued in a very short time and it is likely only a matter of months before a decelerating trend sets in to bring markets back closer in line with underlying fundamentals. The cool-down is likely to be similar to what is currently going on in Alberta.”

 

These reports bring a spark of hope for Saskatoon home buyers who haven’t yet entered the market, as well as renters who feel badly beaten by the impact of rising rents, largely driven by extraordinary increases in home prices. Each day, there seems to be more of a consensus that we’re reaching our peak, for the time being at least.

 

Star Phoenix coverage here

Royal LePage House Price Survey for Saskatchewan

Royal LePage House Price Survey for Canada

RBC Provincial Outlook

 

 

I’m always happy to answer your Saskatoon real estate questions.  Feel free to drop me an email.

 

Norm Fisher

Royal LePage Saskatoon Real Estate
Posted: Sunday, April 06, 2008 9:29 AM by Norm Fisher

Comments

George said:

I have been following Edmonton and Calgary's market for about a half year and these numbers for Royal Lepage are wrong.

Edmontons avg price for a SFH which includes bungalows and 2 stories in Q1 is 395k. I don't see how averaging 330k for a bungalow and 363k for a 2 story = 395k.

http://www.bobtruman.com/Edmonton_SFH_stats/page_1918017.html

So I don't think our prices have reached Edmontons

but I will say that with Saskatoon increasing and Edmonton decreasing the gap has narrowed and affordability is probably about the same.

# April 6, 2008 11:14 AM

Norm Fisher said:

George,

Thank you.

As I said in my post, I'm not quite convinced either. Unfortunately, I'm not yet able to get my hands on the numbers from Edmonton to try to figure it out.

In this area, we provide numbers for very specific types of housing in four different areas defined as "east, east central, north, and west." The $350,000 for bugalows comes from our most expensive areas. I'm guessing that there were comparisons made to some of Edmonton's more affordable areas. There's just too much of a spread remaining when you look at the differnce in the averages for each area, though I suspect that the March numbers will bring them closer once again.

Thanks for the feedback.

# April 6, 2008 11:32 AM

scared renter said:

While I agree that prices in Edmonton exceed Saskatoon for the most part (bad sample?), I would say based on income vs. price, affordability is now worse here.

However, we followed the Alberta market on the way up.  We too will follow the way down... our MLS inventory is starting to build.

# April 6, 2008 11:34 AM

Jason said:

What I find interesting is that if condo prices increase to the $300,000 range by next spring, as my friend was assured by his realtor, our prices will only be second to Vancouver. Pretty amazing price gains for such a short amount of time.

# April 6, 2008 1:20 PM

jrochest said:

Jason:

I think your friend needs a different realtor. Might I suggest Norm? :)

Seriously: yes, prices will probably go up to the silly range, only because they're being driven by outside investors. But they won't stay there: struggling with a nasty rental market is unpleasant, but it's not nearly so unpleasant as owing 300,000 on a condo that you can only sell for 120,000.

It's an interesting report.

# April 6, 2008 1:48 PM

jrochest said:

Oh, and that's a great interview, Norm!

I'm sure there will be a flood of letters to the editor claiming that prices will never go down because the booming Saskatchewan economy will make these prices sustainable by driving salaries to Edmonton/Calgary levels.

But you're right.

# April 6, 2008 1:56 PM

callum said:

Really, do people write those kind of letters in Saskatoon?

I don't believe Saskatonians think that way. My general sense is that they're feeling a little nauseous and they want the ride to stop...

# April 6, 2008 2:32 PM

jrochest said:

Oh, I really hope so. But I've seen people making these arguments: the local CTV station carried this information on Thursday night, I think, and found someone from CMHC who argued that Saskatchewan's economy would be stronger than Alberta's because it is more diverse (Potash will save us all!).

No, I am not joking.

# April 6, 2008 2:57 PM

Heather D. said:

callum,

Nearly everyone I speak to is CONVINCED Saskatoon's real estate market is only going to get worse this year.  As most things go, the only people who care are the one's affected by it.

I had a friend tell me yesterday one month after buying his $300K house that he could now sell it for $370K, *cough*... BULL$HIT!  Some people just need to get their head out of their a$$.

I would LOVE the ride to stop, abruptly.  :')

# April 6, 2008 4:03 PM

Alexander Trauzzi said:

I don't want to see people who've bought in at high prices suffer because of a sharp drop.  I really think there needs to be something to equalize out all the unnecessary debt though.

It's too much and we've hurt our own economy by allowing the greed to run rampant.

What's the point in incurring debt that the country has a stake in as well, only to pay it to some lucky rich guy?

Has never and will never make sense to me.  It's been very irresponsible so far.  I still maintain that nothing will blow up overnight though.  Part of being "Canada" is that we take care of ourselves -- or at least we used to.

Maybe things will go badly?

# April 6, 2008 5:49 PM

jrochest said:

I think that people who've bought at high prices are bound to suffer at a sharp drop: but there won't be a sharp drop, there will be a slow leak. Ordinary folks who got stampeded I feel sorry for. Flippers? I'll pass the demons the pincers and the hot oil.

Heather: if by 'worse' you mean 'more expensive', I agree. I don't think we're at the top yet, by a long shot. We've only just started to go up and most bubbles get really unaffordable before they deflate.

I think I'll be sitting in a rental apartment throwing pay into GICs for at least 3 years, probably 4.

# April 6, 2008 6:27 PM

Sunny said:

I had an argument with some people recently concerning this issue. They believe that our prices are going to continue higher and I said I hoped it was not. They think that it's SK's day for a heyday like Ab's been having, but I don't think we've built the economy to have that heyday yet. So unfortunately there are still those that believe our high prices will rise even more and they think it's justified to do so. I hope it will not rise even more or we are going to squeeze out the middle classed people from SK due to not being able to afford the cost of every day living. I guess we will all have to wait and see. I can honestly say I never thought the average sale in Saskatoon would be 320,000!!! But it is.

# April 6, 2008 6:54 PM

Robin said:

Honestly, the sooner the bottom falls out from under this unjustified, overpriced nightmare, the better.  I hope it all falls to a thundering thud.  I would feel bad for those folks who overpaid for their house, but otherwise, common sense desperately needs to return to this oversized town we call Saskatoon.

# April 6, 2008 7:15 PM

Concerned said:

Robin, Heather, and some others,

You seem to indicate you would be quite happy if the bottom fell out and good honest people who have bought into the market lost a fortune.

Not everyone who buys into this market is evil. It is a little disconcerting you wish ill fortune on them, and hope to benefit from it.

Why should they care about you and your plights if you are just counting down until their downfall?

It is one thing to act and care for affordable housing, another to only be self serving. Shannon, whom has nothing to benefit from all her work, has gone to great lenghts to help others. Heather, you have been posting here a while, what have you done except hold back contractor's names (so you could benefit), bully other's (calling into question Todd's upbrining in another thread), and wish misfortune on others?

I do hope the city comes through for hard working and underpriviledged citizens struggling to find a place to call home. I am a little sick of some though who care only for themselves.

# April 6, 2008 9:00 PM

jrochest said:

I don't think people who expect prices to fall are wishing misfortune on others: in fact, when prices return to a more reasonable level it will be good for everyone except the few who've bought at inflated prices.  

But the bottom <i>will</i> fall out eventually!

I don't think anyone here is in a "plight". We'll rent: that's getting harder and more annoying, but it's not a real hardship -- particularly since the condos on the market are converted rental units, so if you buy one you're just paying twice as much money to live in a rental unit with a new paint job.

I am concerned about unaffordable rents, lack of tenant protection and too many condo conversions. I think lots of people here are, especially Shannon. These are bad because they force people out of the city and put a heavy burden on low-income households who need low-cost rentals -- kids starting out, recent immigrants, seniors on fixed income, single parents and the working poor. They also put an extra burden on university students, which could cause a drop on enrollment at U of S -- and will drain money from rural families who have to help their kids survive in the city. You can't eliminate housing for a whole class of people without damaging the larger community.

# April 6, 2008 9:39 PM

Alexander Trauzzi said:

Concerned,

I think the biggest difficulty is we have all these people goading the market.

Some who try to analyze it use these very high level and overly orchestrated theories to "solve" problems.  Others just come on with some frothy victory rant about their superior abilities to read a market.

It isn't that much of a feat.  I'm sure everyone would be such a genius if they had access to the cash!

To me, a lot of the talk seems to intentionally distance from any hope of a solution.  It's a game of smoke and mirrors keeping people from getting too close to a solution.

But by far, the most damning and most contemptible aspect of all this is the stark denial of the broad daylight examples around us today.

It doesn't help that we have Alberta with - yes - the smoldering remains of a middle class.  It doesn't help that we have the United States, run dry by an ignorant lack of social policy and recognition of reality.

It doesn't matter how much happens *around* Saskatchewan, it will still suffer the deranged fantasies of free market opportunists.  They'll do anything to keep the circumstances exactly as they are by keeping everyone second guessing the merit of any solution.  They've locked the discussion up tight on the basis that if their cash cows are at all impacted, the solution is wrong.  I don't see why their greed doesn't get the axe all together - profit is lowest priority without doubt.

Some people think laissez faire will be different in Saskatchewan because -- why?  I don't get it.  Wake up, look around and see the damage already done elsewhere.

You can't get a more obvious slap to the face.

Who has this kind of cash though?  Seriously?!  Nobody answers that and nobody addresses the examples all around Saskatchewan proving just how bad this kind of growth is.  It's always skimmed over for other points to cherry pick.  "Rarara, any government involvement is bad."  "You can't solve things with regulation."  Sure you can!

The only reason the wealthy have so much to complain about losing is because they have out-leveraged the rest of the economy into a position of having more.

So forgive anyone who thinks that there should be a tremendous backlash.

I don't personally think it is helpful, I want everyone to succeed!  That's not only common sense and respect for your fellow man, it's good community building!

I just don't think *wealth over others* should decide whether you get a better shot to own a home over someone who doesn't yet...

# April 6, 2008 9:59 PM

Robin said:

Concerned,

I've seen far too many people stressed to the hilt over the threat (and often reality!) of losing their homes due to this greedy, crazy, nightmarish housing market.  Seniors have died from stress because of this nightmare.  

Honestly, I really don't think that wishing for the bottom to fall out immediately is overly selfish on my part.  Too many people have suffered as a result of this fictitious boom; this ridiculous speculative market.  

Obviously, I don't wish any bad things to happen to the good, honest people who made the most difficult decision to buy during this crazy time.  That is why I think I mentioned that I would feel bad for such people if the bottom were to fall out immediately.  However, that doesn't mean I can't still wish for it to happen.  This sudden, unjustified rise in prices and profits has done nothing but harm people, and made rich people even richer.  A sudden end to this problem would help more people than harm, I think.

# April 7, 2008 12:37 AM

Heather D. said:

jrochest,

That's exactly what I was saying, everyone still thinks it's going to get worse, even you.  I'll take the minority stance and say that we're at our peak.

"bubbles get really unaffordable before they deflate. "  If you don't think Saskatoon's market is "really unaffordable" yet, and since we're pretty much as unaffordable as Calgary, I guess both markets are damned.  I do think you're being overly pessimistic, I believe you'll be seeing more opportunity for yourself within a year or two.

Concerned,

It's ignorant to say I'm wishing ill fortune on others... however I am wishing the investments of some who've contributed to the problem will flop.

I think you're forgetting that most people who are in the market were either in before the boom, or have come from other places with tonnes of equity.  These people have made HUGE gains, and when the market recedes, they will have lost NOTHING, they will still have a profit.

Sure, I'm self-serving and care only for myself.  You've contributed nothing to this discussion, only criticism.  I'm glad you support Todd's attitude, that's just what this world needs.  Maybe come back with your real name and a legitimate arguement and we'll talk.

# April 7, 2008 6:36 AM

George said:

Norm,

here is another website for Edmonton's stats.  It does not say price per bungalow or 2 storey but the average does show around 385k not 330k.

http://www.ereb.com/pdf/QuarterStats.pdf

# April 7, 2008 9:47 AM

seller said:

I don't see any imminent "crash" coming. All I see is possibly a stop to the overbid process. I have noticed a lot of realtors trying to keep up the practice of bid wars and failing. I know a lot of that is fuelled by homeowners who are wishing for last spring too, and some realtors are just doing as they are told. I can see the prices sort of 'pausing', but certainly not dropping. Houses are still selling by the buckets, which means many people can still afford to buy. I'm just not sure the market will raise any higher than it's at currently this summer. I think more full value offers will go through without making overbids necessary, as long as prices aren't inflated any more than they currently are. I can see a plateau possibly, but certainly not the doomsday crash that is making people a little uneasy who are getting ready to list. Just my two bits - hard to predict the unpredictable.

# April 7, 2008 11:28 AM

Norm Fisher said:

seller,

You make some good points. While conditions do seem to be slowly improving for buyers, we're a long way from imminent doom. The current market can only be described as a seller's market. If we get to 1000 listings, bidding wars will probably thin right out and some properties may fail to sell but that's really the way that it should work.

George,

This study is supposed to be about a specific type of property in a specific part of town. The detached bungalow for instance is supposed to reflect the price of a detached bungalow, 1100ish square feet with a single attached garage. Thus my suggestion that the media could be comparing that home is Saskatoon's most expensive area to that home in Edmonton's most affordable.

# April 7, 2008 11:45 AM

Sunny said:

Okay I do take offense to the comment that most in the market were in before the boom or had tonnes of equity. I do think that a lot of the market is investors, but quite a few of the people involved are like myself, they want a home and are unsure if there is going to be an end in sight for prices. I don't think it's fair to lump everyone into the same pile right now. I can tell you that we don't have tonnes of equity, since I've been living in Saskatoon for 9 years, but we wanted a home and didn't know if we would be able to afford one in a year or so if the prices kept climbing. So for my sake, and others, I'm hoping the market won't 'crash' and I'm left regretting my purchase, as I'm sure many others are feeling also. We've all got to remember that not everyone out there is looking to make a buck, but just looking to live.

# April 7, 2008 12:57 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Sunny,

How long have you been in your house?

# April 7, 2008 1:39 PM

Heather D. said:

Sunny,

Don't take offence, I am still in the boat you got out of.  I was directing that at the point that if the market errodes a LARGE percentage of people will have lost NOTHING.  It's the people who bought in at the end of the peak which will be hurting, unfortunately.  I obviously wasn't saying EVERYONE has equity, but a fair amount do to cushion the blow.

# April 7, 2008 3:52 PM

Sunny said:

We bought our house last spring, so we got in ahead of this year's big increase, but homes had still taken a huge increase by the time we could buy. Unfortunately we get stuck in the bidding wars and put bids on 7 different places until we got our place. We'd been looking for 6 weeks and were getting discouraged since we were being told we were going to have to up our budget (prices kept climbing), and we just didn't feel comfortable doing that. I really feel for the people that are feeling hopeless right now because we've been there and other young couples that are friends of ours are going through the same thing. We had friends that had to buy at Aberdeen because even the fixer uppers in Saskatoon were beyond their reach. I know alot of people think that Saskatoon is just catching up, but being a young professional couple like we are, I just don't see our economy catching up with the housing prices so something has to give.

And Heather I know it's got to be frustrating right now if you are looking, I've been there, but I don't wish the housing to crash because some honest people will be hurt too, I hope it tapers off a bit so that we can still keep Saskatoon affordable for anyone that wants a home. The home we got is not my dream home, but it's our starter home. We had to sacrifice a lot of our wish list because we just couldn't afford it all. We'd rather not stay awake at night worrying about our payments. :) But we have time to develop it and then move up to the 'dream home' in the future. :)

# April 7, 2008 10:25 PM

Heather D. said:

Sunny,

Very smart, I'm happy you were able to get into the market last spring, you should be sitting pretty right now.  It was wise of you not to "up" your budget so you would feel uncomfortable about monthly mortgage payments, unfortunately not everyone took caution.  There was a big panic about getting into the market before being priced out permanently, which I think is ridiculous.  If a person is thinking about getting into a 40 year mortgage and putting 30-40% of your income towards it monthly that person should probably just keep saving and rent until the market is better - of course that's only my opinion.  I'm much more conservative with money compared to others I know.

I agree that while our real estate has "caught up" our wages have NOT.  I really don't expect the market to crash like in the States, but I suspect entry level buyers will have a lot more to look forward to by summer.  :')

# April 8, 2008 11:59 AM

Jansen said:

Hi Norm,

Great work on the blog, I read it frequently.  It is a great service to homebuyers/investors.  Do you have any numbers for average price per sq ft?  (Saskatoon/Edmonton/Calgary/Winnipeg?)  I'm looking for some type of 'normalized' number where you can compare apples to apples.  I think that is what this report is trying to do.  Is the average home that is selling in Edmonton or Calgary larger?

# April 14, 2008 10:57 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Jansen,

Thanks very much. I don't have access to that kind of info for other markets. I just get what comes in the Royal LePage House Price Survey. It just measures certain styles in ceratin areas.

# April 14, 2008 5:01 PM

West Toronto realtor said:

Thanks Norm, good article. I am working as a <a href="http://westtorontorealtor.com">West Toronto realtor</a> and I am not convinced about that numbers either. I am usually following all the reports and from time to time  some sensation like this appear but usually is also buried fast too. If prices in Saskatoon are really higher it has to be just some special occurrence. If you check prices in Edmonton now, you can see at a glance that prices in Saskatoon could be hardly higher. Somebody above in a discussion promised  to reveal  his own research. I am really looking forward to seeing it.

# April 15, 2008 5:23 AM

West Toronto realtor said:

Thanks Norm, good article. I am working as a <a href="http://westtorontorealtor.com">West Toronto realtor</a> and I am not convinced about that numbers either. I am usually following all the reports and from time to time  some sensation like this appear but usually is also buried fast too. If prices in Saskatoon are really higher it has to be just some special occurrence. If you check prices in Edmonton now, you can see at a glance that prices in Saskatoon could be hardly higher. Somebody above in a discussion promised  to reveal  his own research. I am really looking forward to seeing it.

# April 15, 2008 5:28 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required) 

 

Comment Notification

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS