Welcome to Saskatoon Real Estate Resource Centre Blog Sign in | Help
Saskatoon real estate: Week in review (March 17-20)

New listing activity cooled significantly in the Saskatoon real estate market this week with just 116 properties being offered for sale, down from 156 last week. Still, active listings on the Saskatoon MLS managed to creep up slightly to 423 units including 274 single-family homes (houses) and 112 condos. 63 additional homes are showing as “conditionally sold.”

 

Sales activity also took a bit of a slide, though not as sharply as the drop in new listings. 86 properties were reported sold on the MLS compared to 97 the previous week, and 100 during the same week last year. With nearly three fourths of the month behind us, it is conceivable that unit sales could come in below the levels seen during March 2008. Given the rapid changes in “affordability,” I think we can likely expect some down months soon.

 

Buyer attitudes remained aggressive. I heard of many instances where the old “delayed presentation of offers” strategy failed to produce results, but 55% of the Saskatoon homes that were reported sold achieved selling prices that exceeded list. They knew what they wanted and they went after it hard with the average overbid exceeding $15,000. While this particular stat has been on the grow in recent weeks, it hasn’t been above 50% since the week of August 20-24.

 

Average selling prices went through the roof breaking a new weekly record at $312,470 compared to the previous high of $275,825. This massive increase can be explained by a smaller than normal number of sales in areas 4 and 5, while areas 1, 2 and 3 were all quite active.

Saskatoon real estate: Week in review (March 17-20)

Notable sales

 

  • Meadowgreen bungalow at 1,070 square feet with a double garage fetches $285,000.
  • River Heights one-bedroom apartment (624’) goes for $161,000.
  • Lakewood Pine Creek town house breaks a new record for this development at $285,000.
  • Caswell Hill one and one half storey in really rough shape and listed at $99,900 sells $63,000 over list.
  • Varsity View bungalow (1,080’) with no garage brings seller over $411,000.

 

Geographic boundaries of “areas” defined

Process of data collection and calculation

 

I’m always happy to answer your Saskatoon real estate questions.  Feel free to drop me an email.

 

Norm Fisher

Royal LePage Saskatoon Real Estate

 

Posted: Saturday, March 22, 2008 9:27 PM by Norm Fisher

Comments

Jedi said:

Norm,

Happy Easter to you, your family, and all the participants of this blog. Thanks again for all the work with the stats, articles, and responses.

Quick question regarding condos,

with all the conversion it seemed that there was supposed to be a mass flood of invetory. What we have seen is the number of condos go down each week. Are they just not on the market yet or why are we seeing this trend?

# March 22, 2008 11:00 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Jedi,

Happy Easter to you and your as well.

Condos? Well, we know that council approved applications that affected about 1500 units last year. How many have actually made it to the market is a tough call. I know that many of those approvals were granted in Q3 and Q4, so those may not be available for resale yet. That said, quite a few have come out, and yes, they've been selling. We were building up some condo inventory towards the end of last year but about two weeks into this year the market started to go nuts again and people seem convinced that they must "buy now, or forever be out of the market." Year to date, 339 units have been reported sold to the MLS. That compares to 171 for the same period last year, so the demand is certainly stronger then I imagined it would be.

# March 23, 2008 9:56 AM

Northstar said:

Anyone,

    from Calgary have any insight in to what's going on there?  It seems as if your market is starting to show signs of life.  

http://www.canadian-housing-price-charts.235.ca/canadian_housing_price_chart.htm

    By no means would I consider that a start of another up trend, but a couple more months in that direction and I might.

Norm,

   Quite an average sales price there.  I'm looking forward to the month end numbers.  Are you as busy right now as you were this time last year?

# March 23, 2008 9:35 PM

Jake Neufeld said:

Condo inventory has definitely been dropping:

From Norm's weekly stats:

Condos available

Dec 3-7:   194

Dec 10-14: 187

Dec 17-21: 174

Dec 24-28: 164

Dec 31-4:  156

Jan 7-11:  172

Jan 14-18: 178

Jan 21-25: 157

Jan 28-1:  142

Feb 4-8:   154

Feb 11-15: 133

Feb 18-22: 135

Feb 25-29: 127

Mar 3-7:   ?

Mar 10-14: 116

Mar 17-20: 112

If this trend continues it looks like condo prices will continue to increase.

Norm, is there an easier way to get these stats rather than scouring through old posts?

# March 23, 2008 9:54 PM

Johny said:

Here's another interesting chart.  Inventory for Feb08.

http://findcalgary.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/marinventory.gif

A very interesting time for calgary.  I'm not sure that I understand why inventory is up over 100% from last year and unit sales are half of what they were... and yet sales prices continue to climb.  Norm, any thoughts on indications?  

J.

# March 24, 2008 12:43 AM

Smokey said:

Johny,

It is not so simple to understand why prices are up over last year in Calgary. It is because of speculative buying and overbuilding. Prices were drivin' up by many to make the fast buck. Speculative buying outpaced the need. Many people were priced out of markets in Alberta. There will be an oversupply problem for a while as there inventory is up over 40  percent in many places in Alberta. The question lies will this happen to Saskatchewan. The problem is caused by easy credit, and was made worse by 40 year mortgages. There have been numerous examples of housing prices skyrocketing, and then it caused oversupply, especially in the states. I refuse to call Alberta situation a bubble, as a average home in Calgary is still 477,000, and Edmonton is up over 390,000, and prices have held firm for a few months. Will Saskatchewan have this problem.  Is there too much construction and over supply. Will the weakening commodity prices slow down the economy. Will the recession in US negatively effect us here, or are we immune. If I have learned one thing with this boom, hardly anyone saw it coming, and there are too many factors that led to it. I am curious if the housing boom will continue for a while in Saskatchewan. Prices have gone up, and in Alberta, builders did eventually catch up, in many centers. Will Saskatchewan builders eventually catch up to the need. Anyones guess. The only thing I know in regards to Alberta situation is that economics 101 is thrown out right now. No one can explain the psyche of buyers to pay the prices there when there is so much inventory. Maybe the problem is that new home buyers pay the sticker price too much, and we lack the financial savvy of previous generations. There was a graph that I saw that I wish I had the link too, that indicated that when a bust is on, prices drop twice. That often there is a period where people buy again thinking that prices have gone down to where they will go. Then the prices fall again after prices stabilize for a short period. I think the term the graph used was the "dead cats bounce." If history shows that prices held firm, then I will be surprised. You got to think something has to give. The only thing that I really know is that I really don't know all that much.

# March 24, 2008 1:36 AM

Heather D. said:

I'm glad sales didn't increase, but the average sale price this week is just ridiculous!!!  The more this market inflates the bigger the correction necessary.  IMO these people buying in right now are guaranteed to lose money on their investment over the next couple years.  I hope next weeks stats look better...

Smokey,

You're presenting some very interesting points.  I really do think that younger generations pay the price tag ALL too often, rather than questioning it.  40 year mortgages certainly don't help the situation.  Take a look at the saving habits of Canadians.  Not good.  We've followed the American trend of acquiring more and more debt while saving less and less.  Certainly not like older generations who knew the value of a dollar.  This lack of responsibility makes me concerned for the future.

# March 24, 2008 2:06 AM

tb said:

I really enjoy reading this blog but the repetitive doom and gloom story after 6 posts are sooooo boring!!!

Surprised I haven't read the popular "greed" reference yet.

# March 24, 2008 7:38 AM

Jake Neufeld said:

Just for you tb:

Ohhh noooo prices are just tooo high. *greed*.

# March 24, 2008 8:45 AM

Mike said:

The condo market has been relatively soft compared to the housing market. Do we expect the condo market to pick up when affordablity becomes a serious issue? Buyers will start to look more into affordable condos instead of houses.

# March 24, 2008 8:58 AM

Jedi said:

Mike,

Please explain condo market being soft. They are selling like hotcakes. Do you mean in regard to pricing?

# March 24, 2008 9:28 AM

Johny said:

I think we are seeing affordability become a serious issue and that is why we're seeing the condo market pick up.  

J.

# March 24, 2008 10:09 AM

Ben said:

Hi Norm,

Do you think the west side is a good buy right now?  Just curious with the recent crime report (saskatoon being number 2 in the nation for crime reports)

# March 24, 2008 10:13 AM

Johny said:

I don't get it, the comment on condos was mine but my name isn't Ben.  Norm, better check those mice under the blog-hood ;)

J.

# March 24, 2008 10:14 AM

Ken said:

Northstar:

The explanation of the apparent contradictiction to normal market behaviour in Calgary (high inventory and a rising average price)that is gaining credibility is that the sales mix has moved up. That the rising average price indicator is not indicative of the market price direction or of the state of the market.The graph on this page seems to support this.

http://calgaryrealestatemarketblog.wordpress.com/

# March 24, 2008 10:15 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Johny,

Not sure what to make of that. Not only the wrong name, but linked to another website. Sorry about that, and thanks for letting me know.

# March 24, 2008 11:39 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Calgary.  My former associate Nevin moved there last July. Before the move, he spent about ten years selling homes here. I called him last week to ask what's going on out there and he basically said the same thing Ken is saying above. Lots and lots of smaller entry level stuff languishing on the market. We did a bit of a swap on some recently sold homes. He sent me about ten listings that he says have comparable locations to those I sent him with the comment, "Saskatoon is almost as high, perhaps at par." Hmmm.

He also said, with a bit of a chuckle, "I should have stuck around for another year. The value of the home we bought is down quite a bit." Says his pal bought a property last spring last year. It's a new home. Apparently, one right across the street just sold for 140K less than his friend paid for his. Ouch!

# March 24, 2008 11:48 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Johny,

"Do you think the west side is a good buy right now? "

Of course, I am at a loss to predict where this market is going but there's not much that I would consider a "good buy."

I also don't buy the results of the MacLean's piece. First of all, those stats are from 2006. You also have to read the fine print, as our designation of "2nd most dangerous" is only related to one offense, as I understand it. Not that we shouldn't be very concerned about leading in sexual assaults. My wife does volunteer work for Victim Services at the Saskatoon Police Service. Every file passes through that office. She tells me that incidents are "way down" in every category since shortly after the new chief took over.

# March 24, 2008 11:56 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Jake,

"is there an easier way to get these stats rather than scouring through old posts?"

Well, not today, but I will give that some thought. There should be something we can do and I appreciate the suggestion.

Heather,

This week's average is really only indicative of a shift in activity, not so much in value. As I mentioned in the  post, not much happened in area 4 and 5. Normally there are more unit sales in these areas that would keep the average lower. I suspect we'll see that come back around this week.

# March 24, 2008 12:00 PM

Ben said:

The west-side question was mine but thanks for the response Norm!  

# March 24, 2008 1:56 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Thanks Ben,

How odd. Johny's name on your comment, your name on his.

# March 24, 2008 2:26 PM

Norm Fisher said:

tb,

Lol! Thanks! Well, you're not at a movie waiting for the action to start. You could jump right in and mix it up a bit, unless you're afraid of bears. :)

# March 24, 2008 2:34 PM

George said:

Norm,

could the drop of listings and sales be due to Good Friday and the long weekend?  I am actually amazed at the amount of sales this week.  I thought there would be a bigger drop.  Very surprised by the average price being so high, that is a big jump.

# March 24, 2008 7:15 PM

Norm Fisher said:

George,

A four day reporting period could well have played a role.

The rise in the average is closely related to the number of sales in different areas and shouldn't be viewed as rising prices necessarily.

# March 24, 2008 7:29 PM

George said:

I agree, but come month end when SREB and the Star Phoenix publishes 280k  for an average home, it will be viewed as home prices increasing quickly.  Most people out there are told of 15-30% increases in Saskatoon this year. More people will try to get in the market when they hear prices going up.  It's almost as if both feed of each other. (rising prices= more people in the market and vice versa)  

# March 24, 2008 7:57 PM

Norm Fisher said:

In fact, the monthly averages have not been representative of what's really going on. You have a ton of -$120,000 condos which are keeping the average down. Sad but true.

# March 24, 2008 8:31 PM

George said:

yeah, I agree.  Meadow Green condos and any conversions in the abc jungle will be Tee-rashed in a year or so.  Condos like that put the average down.

# March 24, 2008 8:36 PM

Heather D. said:

Because the market is so over-inflated I expect that lower priced condos will help keep the average price down because that's all entry-level buyers can afford now.  These kinds of properties will continue to sell because of Saskatoon's unaffordability.  (As what Johny was pointing out)

# March 24, 2008 11:56 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Paul sent this recent article on the "slump" in commodity prices and how that may impact the Canadian economy as we struggle to avoid fallout from a US recession.

http://tinyurl.com/2yxqc6

# March 25, 2008 7:45 AM

George said:

Last week was the perfect time to pick up some stocks  in commodities.  The future for commodities looks very bright for Saskatchewan even though the US may hamper some of this growth.

Because of the US recession the markets will be up and down the next while and nothing will be immune even commodities.  But I feel commodities will be the least affected during this time and will do very well in the short (2 years) and long term.

# March 25, 2008 9:17 AM

tb said:

Norm, I think I am a little scared to get involved with this cyclic arguments.

Wondering though, how much hassle would it be to look at an average selling price per sq foot?  Would this provide a more stable weekly price figure?

# March 25, 2008 12:20 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Hi tb,

Thanks for the comment.

Originally, when started the week in review, my intention was really to show the relationship between list and sale prices, and the over, under and at thing. I was thinking more in terms of giving the consumer a feel for market temperature, as opposed to market value. That said, it's clear to me that it's time to rethink the whole thing and perhaps make some changes. Your suggestion is one which I'll explore as I try to get that figured out.

Thanks again for the valuable feedback.

# March 25, 2008 12:59 PM

Carl said:

My memory does seem to be working so well, a couple of weeks ago, i remeber reading postings about the costs of building a house.  One person mentioned that they were quoted $300/sqft, and somebody pointed out that they should be able to get $200/sqft.  Can somebody let me know who these builders are?

# March 25, 2008 3:39 PM

Heather D. said:

Carl,

The less expensive builders are usually smaller companies.  Drive around some of the newer neighbourhoods and write down comapanies and contact numbers.  Then phone them and ask what they're approximately building for right now.  This is the biggest purchase of your life, it's wise to shop around and ask questions.

# March 25, 2008 4:55 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Carl,

Just be very careful. Heard a story on NewsTalk Radio yesterday. At least one builder has abandoned some projects lately. One buyer claimed to be out about 300K.  They advanced cash which was used to complete other homes. He finally ran out of cash and broke the bad nes to his other customers. I have no problems with small builders and many do a good job, but money can be a problem if they're not good with it.

# March 25, 2008 8:27 PM

Chris said:

If a builder asks you for 300k, you should only be thinking one thing, RUN!!!  I can't imagine why anybody would agree to that.  Large builders usually only want something like 5% up front with the balance at possession.  If a smaller builder will save you 5 or 10k but wants you to pay for most of the house before it's finished and you do it, sounds like you are begging to get bent over.

# March 25, 2008 10:51 PM

Brett said:

Would you build someone a house with a 5% deposit?  You agree to build a 400k house on 20k and HOPE the market doesnt dip...what you think happened down south when people signed to have a home built and the market value dropped 100k and they only have 5% on the line...they RUNNNNNN and the builders go belly up!!  The best and safest route for any builder and buyer is a draw mortgage.  We are building a home at the last mountain lake and our builder required 50k up front upon signing the contract to order windows and doors then nothing further until the house is framed.  At that point its an additional 20% of the house price, then at drywall stage another 30% of the funds, then at completion another 30% and then theirs a 10% holdback until 30 days after completion to ensure their are no leins put on the home by any trades then the final payment is due.  In this case it ensures fairness for both builder and client.  I think you are OFF YOUR ROCKER to use a big builder.  I take for example ***** homes in regina.....the skimpiest cheapest no quality control builder and yet they signed to build 500 homes last year...why?? Price...Our builder does 5 homes a year that's it.  Who do you think has more quality control??  The Small guy!! He cares about his clients!!  We built a home last year with ***** and it was a mess!!  Walls framed completely wrong, door locks not working, siding cracked, paint not completed, on and on and on...why?? because they build 10 homes per month in regina alone....no quality control and the cheapest of cheap used for material.  The old saying always applies when building.. YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR....take a look at a crawford home its all OSB sheeting and cheap lumber, go look at a yakobovich home (small builder) they are probably 5 - 10% more in price but they use FIR for all their lumber and sheeting, ***** only does their basement concrete strength at 20 MPA, Yakobovich 25 MPA....whats the difference in price under $500....so yes go ahead use the big builder they WILL be cheaper I dont know what kind of glue your on in saskatoon but the more product you sell the cheaper you can supply isnt that a principle of economics?  In regina its approx $200 a sqft for a 2 storey and $240 a sqft for a bungalow currently to give you some price range ideas

# March 26, 2008 12:19 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Chris,

The money was advanced on this one in stages. As I understood the discussion, much of the estimated cost was to pay invoices that the guy failed to pay. They also claimed to have incurred some costs in fixing things which were not done correctly.

Brett,

I would think that reputation would be a better indicator than big or small. The builder in question was described as a small builder. If the half dozen or so people who were complaining are anywhere near truthful, this guy certainly didn't care much about quality. To make things worse, he obviously didn't have the capital to fund his business.

# March 26, 2008 6:28 AM

wondering said:

Brett,

I agree with you totally on the small builder thing.  I am currently building, and would not even think about using a big builder.  Too many horror stories about them.  My smaller builder is not perfect, but I'm happy with him.  I have a friend who used Yakobovich in Regina, and he absolutely loves his house.  They are slow, but the quality of work is unmatched.

I just want to point out that all small builders usually don't have the lot, you supply it.  So when you ask a sq/ft price, that is just for the building.  When you add in the land, it's substantially more.

# March 26, 2008 6:29 AM

Carl said:

Thanks for the responses about home builders, is there any builders in saskatoon that people would recommend?, and is there builders I should stay away from?  Thanks in advance for your respones

# March 26, 2008 8:14 AM

Heather D. said:

Brett,

Do those prices/sq ft include the lot?  From what I understand in Regina it costs 25% less to build than in Saskatoon, or possibly cheaper still.

The draw mortgage is how my builder invoices too, it's fair for both builder and client.  I know my guy takes a lot of pride in the quality of house he builds, he is there supervising all the time, and only builds 5ish houses/year.

# March 26, 2008 9:06 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Just a reminder everyone.

If you're going to issue a "STAY AWAY FROM" for Carl, you need to be prepared to back it up with your full name and an email in the URL field.

# March 26, 2008 9:10 AM

Jedi said:

Interesting discussion.

I would love to contribute, but don't know the full application of libel and slander laws.

Norm, is it appropriate to discuss poor experiences with builders? I am not questioning the appropriateness or value. I just don't want someone going to court for calling out these companies.

# March 26, 2008 9:37 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Jedi,

I am somewhat concerned about hosting this kind of stuff, particularly from anonymous sources. Having said that, anyone prepared to back their comments with a name and a verifiable email address in the URL field is welcome to issue a warning. However, if someone is not prepared to stand behind it with an identity then I will have to delete it.

That s not to say that it wouldn't be slander or libel. consult your attorney. :)

# March 26, 2008 10:51 AM

Brett said:

Well the lot price has nothing to do with square footage cost.  If you pay 100k for a lot and build a 1000sqft bungalow your square footage cost is $340 sqft but if you build a 2000sqft bungalow and included the lot cost then your cost is only $290 a sqft so why would you include lot price?  Lots down here are between 80 - 100k in most area except the new wascana view area called the creeks.  The lots there are out of this world 105 - 230k for DIRT!!  You have to be off your rocker to pay that kind of cash for land especially when it doesnt back a lake, golf course or is even a walkout lot.  And I think yes you should slander the builders who are doing poor jobs.  It should be everyones right to know whos doing a great job and whos doing a horrible job.  I keep hearing from a finishing carpenter i know that this is the 1980's all over again with shotty workmanship everywhere.....you wait 5 years people will be saying " you built your house in 2007, 2008 and 2009" Oh man i'd NEVER buy one of those...I can actually think of another example of the shadyness going on.  A fellow agent of mine is building with ***** and they had the basement forms all in ready to pour the basement and he went over to check the progress and they hand not put in any vertical rebar in the basement!!!  He called ***** and they told him they dont insert it till the last thing done but then he went and watched the basement next door put in and they did it while they were putting the forms up because they need to tie the rebar at the bottom and on his house they couldnt do that at that point so they just stuck them in there and hoped for the best....THEN it gets even better!! He went over a week or so later and noticed they had put down the crushed rock for the weeping tile.  But it looked not like it should with a big 4 inch perforated tube with rock over it, it seemed to small.  So he jumps down and kicks the rock aside...NO WEEPING TILE....they were going to just leave out the weeping tile and hope the water finds its way out to drain aroudn the foundation....man I could keep goin on about this company but this is enough for now.

# March 26, 2008 10:57 AM

Norm Fisher said:

Brett,

Wow! That's quite a story.

Again, no names without a name. It's fair to call companies on poor workmanship, but not anonymously.

Thanks for the comment. I agree that people need to be extra careful right now.

# March 26, 2008 11:41 AM

carl said:

I didn't mean to start something illegal, but the information will be valuable, so maybe it's best to focus on the positve experiences.  So I will rephraise my question.  Has anybody had a positive experience with a smaller builder they would like to share?  Is this ok Norm?

# March 26, 2008 12:13 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Hey Carl,

I'm not particularly concerned about legality. Canadians have pretty broad rights when it comes to speaking out.

I am more concerned with fairness. If one has had a bad experience and they want to speak about it publicly, they shouldn't have a problem attaching their name to it. That way, the accused can also have an opportunity to speak to it if they choose to do so but it's not even possible to defend against an anonymous complaint.

# March 26, 2008 1:32 PM

Alexander Trauzzi said:

Norm,

I very much support what you're saying.  I often find that anonymous complaints are met with very broad anonymous rebuttals!

I lay out some pretty thick blame for politicians these days, but it isn't without direction.  Certainly we can see that we have disinterested and selfish individuals in positions of power.

This goes against everything "representation" means to me which I think - without being unfair - is a position of humble sacrifice.  Not entitlement and opportunity.

Anyway, when the rebuttals have to have a name attached, suddenly respondents grow a conscience...

We've even seen that here.

# March 26, 2008 2:32 PM

Heather D. said:

If a person slanders a generalized group there's nothing to be held accountable for, LOL!  I say stay AWAY from the large building companies, they'll milk yah for all you're worth!  I had one company tell me they won't build a house for less than $400K.  Sure they can be picky now, but when things slow and they're anxious for jobs I'll be making sure to tell everyone I talk to which companies were the dirtiest.  Word of mouth is a powerful thing.

Brett,

Somebody on here questioned my price/sq ft estimate whether or not it included lot, so I didn't know if that's what you had included.  Obviously lot prices can differ, but if you call some of the larger builders some will quote you a price/sq ft that includes the lot.

I'm surprised at your price/sq ft!  That's pretty steep yet.  Minus a lot I have two builders telling me they're building right now for under $200/sq ft.

Carl,

Sorry I can't share any names for small builders at this point.  I have 2 estimates from 2 different contractors and I've got to wait and see when I can get a lot.  Once I'm in a contract with one of them I'll be pass along their company names.  If you don't get any referrals from others, I again recommend driving around construction areas and taking down some names and numbers.

# March 26, 2008 4:25 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Heather,

Yes, broad generalizations are fine. :)

I think the point Brett was trying to make is that PPSF, including a lot often presents an inaccurate picture. For instance, if you contracted a 1000 square foot bungalow at $350 psf including the lot and you later decided to build at 1100 square feet you wouldn't want to pay an extra $350 psf, or you'd be paying for a portion of your land a second time.

Carl,

I don't have any suggestions either but I think I'd start by making sure they're on this list.

http://www.homebuildersdirectory.ca/

# March 26, 2008 6:14 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Oh, Heather,

I think you're secretly building this house yourself and you just don't want to get too busy with other jobs. :)

# March 26, 2008 6:16 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Alex,

The value of "representation" has been tainted across the board by people who care more about themselves than they do about the privilege they've been given.

Further to your other point on attacks. It's one thing to have a little scrapping between two anonymous individuals and another to have specific, and potentially damaging attacks against known individuals or companies. If someone wants to hurt someone else they should have the courage to be known.

...and don't think that because we know your name that you're safe. :)

# March 26, 2008 6:25 PM

Jason said:

Just read that the government has pulled funding for the Station 20 Pleasant Hill revitilization project. Apparently in the new "booming" Saskatchewan, people who happen to live in one of the most violent, crime neighbourhoods don't deserve a break to help turn things around. The eco friendly project was to include health and dental facilties, a grocer, as well as a library. Quite a loss for the residents of the neighbourhood. This could have really helped to turn around the area.

With stories like the new government selling off the affordable Sask housing units in Watrous and Young, and then this, you have to wonder whats on the horizon next.

# March 27, 2008 11:42 AM

Heather D. said:

Norm,

You found me out!  :'O

BTW neither of my contractors/builders are on that list.  Those are only larger companies again that build prob 20+ houses/year.  These are the companies I recommend boycotting!  But who knows, if a person did some calling around to the lesser known names on that list they might be able to find a deal, but I doubt it.

I understood what Brett was saying, but if you call a builder that supplies the lot they give you a rough estimate of PPSF that includes the lot.  These builders are holding lots hostage and waiting to see who will come along and pay the highest price for it.  There was 1 lot listed "for sale" on Point2Homes not too long ago for ~$30K over the purchase price, and you STILL had to build with the guy who was selling it.

Jason,

That's sad to hear, a handful of places on the West side need some revitalizing.  Not that Atch cares, how is that going to contribute to the bottom line?  I guess they're just hoping that entry level buyers will be forced to buy in the slums, and the undesirables will be forced to live in the streets.  :')

# March 27, 2008 12:39 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Jason,

Sad indeed! I also note that the latest budget didn't include anything for a school which residents have been promised for years.

Heather,

Perhaps I'm mistaken regarding my recommendation but I do know that those who are members of the Saskatoon Region Home Builder's Association have to offer "warranty" as a condition of membership. At least I believe that's the case.

# March 27, 2008 1:31 PM

Cindy said:

Warranty means nothing....Anyone catch the story on the news not too long ago about bad home warranties?  They do nothing to help you.  In fact, a freind of mine bought new 2 years ago - still waiting on some of the warranty work - including leaky basement!!!!

I heard, through friends that built that Fraser Homes did a great job and they came right away to address a couple of minor concerns.  They were very happy with the quality of workmanship and the professionalism.  

No affiliation - it is okay to say good things isnt it:)

# March 27, 2008 8:24 PM

Heather D. said:

Norm,

Both of my builders are under the new home warranty, but like Cindy is saying, I'm not sure how much that warranty will help when stuff actually goes wrong...

# March 27, 2008 10:09 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Cindy and Heather,

Kind of like insurance is today. You know that you're paying for it, but you don't really know if you have it until you actually need it. :)

Heard a story recently of an insurance company trying to avoid a woman's claim because she forgot to disclose that she was treated for acne when she was 14.

# March 28, 2008 6:44 AM

Chris said:

Building a house and selling at today's rate is no different than buying in to the futures market, or stocks/bonds.  You're taking a gamble.  Would I build a house with only 5% down?  You're damn right I would, because prices aren't going to crash before it's finished.  They might dip or decline, but not enough for a builder to lose money.

Do you really think building a house costs anywhere even remotely CLOSE to what they sell them for?  I bought my house brand new in 2002, and insurance pegged the structure replacement cost at $120k.  Lets be pessimistic and assume that the cost to build has doubled since then.  That same house now costs $240k to build, and the lots have increased by about $50k since then, for a grand total of $290k (this is just my guessing but i bet it's close).  

Now how much do they sell that house for that cost them 290k?  Well a house comparable to mine in stonebridge or willow grove will cost you in the neighborhood of $420k.  That means that our housing market would have to crash by about 31% in one year before the builders would lose money on a sale.

So no, I wouldn't give a builder more than 5 or 10% down, and I wouldn't give them more at intervals as the job was done either.  If they can't afford to finish my house without closing shop if i'm not financing it, then I don't want them building my house.  The down payment is only to guarantee that once the house is finished that i'm the one to get to buy it at the agreed on price.  

Don't forget that when prices were shooting up, builders ran away from contracts so they could sell at the higher price, so I don't see why they should deserve special protection from buyers running if the market crashes.  What's good for the goose is good for the gander.  Sometimes when you play the futures market you get screwed, and sometimes you win big, it's a risk you have to take if you want to play.

# March 28, 2008 10:32 AM

Heather D. said:

Chris,

Those are some good points you make.  I'm pretty sure the profit margin you estimate is fairly accurate, they're making big time money right now!

# March 28, 2008 2:39 PM

Saskatoon Real Estate Resource Centre Blog said:

Residential listing activity picked up the pace this week with a total of 164 single family homes (houses)

# March 30, 2008 11:58 AM

Robin said:

Last Friday night, I went to a meeting put together by Shannon Christensen. She's a homeowner who isn't directly affected by the housing crisis, but is deeply concerned with the city's (and the province's) lack of concern and blatant ineptitude with this very important issue. I just received this email from her, and I wanted to post it here, in the hopes that any of us who are concerned about the low vacancy rate in this city and the number of pending condo-conversions that could be approved could have a chance to act and write a letter to the city by 5PM today.

I apologize for the short notice--in hindsight, I wish I was more on the ball on this one, but here we are...

PLEASE READ THIS, AND WRITE TO CITY COUNCIL!!!

===============================================

Good morning,

If you are having difficulty finding a place to live or if your rent has been increased I'd like to suggest that you send your concerns to City Council.

You can use the contact form on the city's web site to do this:

http://saskatoon.ca/org/clerks_office/council/council_write_a_letter.asp

The next Council meeting is April 7. You must send your letters today, April 1st before 5:00 pm.

Your letter does not have to be long. A brief summary of your concerns is all that's required. You may also want to point out if/how much your rent has increased in the last 12 - 18 months.

Also, be clear about what you are asking from Council. For example, if you are writing to ask them NOT to approve the 21 condo conversion applications, state that.

Just a reminder that the city does not have authority to implement rent control. That is a provincial issue. We'll keep you updated on this.

As soon as David Forbes, Saskatoon MLA has drawn up the petition to the City to put a freeze on condo conversions we will have it available for download. You can print it out, fill it with signatures and return it to David.

NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT. Don't sit back and wonder how this will all pan out - we already know the answer to that question. Please take a few minutes today to send your letter to Council.

Also, even if you are not a tenant you can still express your concerns! Several people have sent letters to Council because they see how the housing crisis is affecting their friends, loved ones, clients or someone else they know. Others just feel that what's happening is wrong. Every letter will help!!!

Thank you for passing our emails on to others.

Updates to come.

Have a great day : )

Shannon Christensen

===============================================

As SOON as I get this petition, I'm going to do my best to get it out to everyone I know. I'll post a link to it on facebook so that you all can distribute it as well.

As Shannon says, now is the time to act.

Thanks everyone.

# April 1, 2008 11:09 AM

Robin said:

Here's a bit of an update from Martin Been (who lives in the Milroy):  please attend this meeting if you can.

====================================================

Greetings Everyone

The tenants of the Milroy have arranged for a meeting at:

the Parktown Hotel

Friday, April 4, at 7:00p.m.

room 140.

 After  meeting with various groups concerned with the housing crisis on Friday, March 28,  we realize that the scope of this ongoing struggle has changed, as the court's decision could potentially create and has already created a great deal of hardship on  the rental community.  

A round-table discussion will be "whether to appeal" the Court of Queen's Bench decision allowing the city to approve The Milroy for Condo Conversion.  The lawyer representing the Milroy, Mr. Andrew Mason, will be present at this meeting.

We are extending this invitation to everyone who has been affected by the housing crisis created by our municipal government.

Please bring any questions or concerns you may have, regarding this decision, to the meeting.

Milroy case documents including the Court Of Queen's Bench decision are available at:  www.dufourlaw.com

Martin Been

# April 1, 2008 7:41 PM

Vince said:

Jason, I'd argue Station 20 West was not a complete "health care" project (similar to what the government said) and should not be funded with money for hiring doctors and nurses.  It would have been nice but probably more than essential.  Also, the fact that no private company wants to build a grocery in that neighbourhood speaks to it being not feasible.  If it's such a great idea, why don't a couple wealthy people (like all the doctors/politicians who were for it) open up a private grocery store?  Because they know they'd lose money, and be subject to high security costs.  A small grocery store would not be expensive to set up and that none of these boosters are putting their money where their big mouths are shows that they don't believe in the grocery aspect from a pure economic standpoint - unless funded with taxpayer health care money.

There is definitely no shortage of health care in that area, a drive down 20th shows lots of doctors offices, dentists and St. Paul's Hospital.  Also, Station 20 West is a short drive away.  I wish my area had that kind of health care available.

# April 19, 2008 11:48 AM

Carson said:

So Brett, with regards to your assertion that 5% down for builders is too risky, I completely agree, prices could easily slip 5% and I think it speaks to the fact that they are worried about a drop in prices of more than 5%.  When the people building houses are worried about prices falling, it means they just might.

Having said that.  5% isn't how much they'd lose, houses are more than double a couple years ago, it just means that if they agreed to build a house at a set price, and the buyer walked away, even if prices were down 10 to 15%, they could still sell them for far more than even one year ago, still keep the 5% deposit and make a lot of money, being that while prics are double last year, wages are up only a bit, and materials are up, but no where near double.

Interesting though that builders are afraid of prices dropping and don't want to take a chance of the Saskatoon market keeping prices up.

# April 19, 2008 11:55 AM

Vince said:

Jason, I'd argue Station 20 West was not a complete "health care" project (similar to what the government said) and should not be funded with money for hiring doctors and nurses.  It would have been nice but probably more than essential.  Also, the fact that no private company wants to build a grocery in that neighbourhood speaks to it being not feasible.  If it's such a great idea, why don't a couple wealthy people (like all the doctors/politicians who were for it) open up a private grocery store?  Because they know they'd lose money, and be subject to high security costs.  A small grocery store would not be expensive to set up and that none of these boosters are putting their money where their big mouths are shows that they don't believe in the grocery aspect from a pure economic standpoint - unless funded with taxpayer health care money.

There is definitely no shortage of health care in that area, a drive down 20th shows lots of doctors offices, dentists and St. Paul's Hospital.  Also, [West Winds health clinic] is a short drive away.  I wish my area had that kind of health care available.

Ignore my previous typod post

# April 19, 2008 11:56 AM

George said:

Why is everyone so against condo conversions?  Sure, a few more people may need to rent basement suites, or rent condos from the new owners, but for everyday people, who want to buy a condo, increased conversions will keep prices in check on other units, and increase the number of affordable units on the market.  Also, those condo conversions will be good for the renters when they save enough money to buy a place.

# April 20, 2008 12:40 PM

Norm Fisher said:

George,

You're correct that condo conversions can contribute to the affordable housing stock and they have proven to be a great investment for those getting a start in the ownership market. I think that largest frustration is the fact that there are so few options for renters who have really taken a massive beating over the last year. As was pointed out at the most recent council meeting, a vibrant and healthy economy does require a half decent rental stock.

# April 20, 2008 12:57 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required) 

 

Comment Notification

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS