Welcome to Saskatoon Real Estate Resource Centre Blog Sign in | Help
New study shows housing affordability in Saskatoon on a serious slide: Demographia
New study shows housing affordability in Saskatoon on a serious slide: Demographia 

Saskatoon homes have taken a serious slide in affordability over the past year, landing us in the “Moderately Unaffordable” category according to the Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey: 2008.

 

The survey, prepared by Pavletich Properties Ltd. compares median incomes in 227 markets around the world to median housing prices for the area. Their method of measuring affordability is based on a “median multiple” which is arrived at by dividing the median price of a home by the median income for each municipality. A “median” is the number separating the higher half of a sample from the lower half. For instance, if the median price of a home in Saskatoon is $212,900, we can assume that half of all homes sold here sell above that number and the other half below.

 

In their 2007 survey, which was based on data from the third quarter of 2006, Saskatoon was tied for 15th on the “Most Affordable” list. At that time, the median Saskatoon income was $52,100 and the median price of a home in the city was $138,000. Buyers could expect to pay about 2.6 times annual income for a home.

 

Just one year later, the median income has shown good growth to $60,900 but the median price of a home has risen sharply to $212,900, or 3.5 times annual income, moving us to 77th place internationally on the “Moderately Unaffordable” list.

 

In spite of some deterioration in affordability, Regina managed to maintain its place on the “Most Affordable” list sliding from first place to 12th place, while seeing their median multiplier increase from 2.0 to 2.4. Neither incomes, nor housing prices increased in Regina to the degree that they did in Saskatoon.

 

Thunder Bay was noted as the most affordable place to own a home out of all of the markets surveyed. You can purchase a residence there for only 1.8 times annual income. Other Canadian markets making the “Most Affordable” list include Saguenay, St. John, St. John’s, Windsor, Quebec, Trois-Rivieres, Winnipeg, Sudbury, London, Oshawa and Ottawa.

 

Canada’s “Moderately Unaffordable” markets include Barrie, Halifax, Kingston, Kitchener-Waterloo, Sherbrook, Hamilton, St. Catherines-Niagara and Montreal.

 

Markets landing in the “Seriously Unaffordable” category include Edmonton, Calgary, and Toronto.  

 

The “Severely Unaffordable” list includes Abbotsford, Victoria, Vancouver and Kelowna which is billed as the least affordable market to own a home in Canada. Kelowna home buyers can expect to pay 8.5 times annual income for a home.

 

In Los Angeles, California a home costs 11.5 times annual income making it the least affordable place in the world to own a home.

 

Deteriorating housing affordability is a major issue around the world and a leading contributor to the growing gap between the world’s rich, and the poor. In the introduction to this report, Dr. Donald Brash writes, “And the one factor which clearly separates all of the urban areas with high median multiples from those with low median multiples is the severity of the artificial restraints on the availability of land for residential building…Despite all of the evidence, governments continue to pretend that they are powerless to make housing more affordable or, worse still, implement futile interventions which make the situation worse…”

 

Read the full Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey: 2008 here.

My report on the 2007 survey including a link to the survey is here.

 

I’m always happy to answer your Saskatoon real estate questions.  Feel free to drop me an email.

 

Norm Fisher

Royal LePage Saskatoon Real Estate
Posted: Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:13 PM by Norm Fisher

Comments

Alexander Trauzzi said:

Mr Brash makes a point I've been trying to make.

Embracing new developments can kick one of the legs out from under this issue.  By no means a knock-out solution, but it is probably one of the easiest ingredients to obtain!

We know a culture change of one type or another is unavoidable.  I think it makes much more sense to revise our expectations to allow for a wider variety and higher supply of homes than for most to just be "kicked out".  Especially when the best reason people come up with is "put up or shut up" - and more so when the people saying this are the ones profiting.

Norm, I'd still love to see a curve that defines just how many people exist in each bracket.  Basing our understandings on averages leaves not only the poor out, but hey even the rich (to be fair).

Maybe with a higher resolution on the data, you'd see that Canada's job markets are simply a series of short plateaus, separated by some rather unpopulated valleys...

# January 26, 2008 11:32 PM

Heather D. said:

Sick.  Is Saskatoon going to move to the top of the "moderately unaffordable" list or even move into the "seriously unaffordable" list before our market starts erroding?!  Equilibrium seems to elude us...

# January 27, 2008 2:27 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Alex,

I'll just point out that these numbers are not "averages" but medians, so we can assume that half of the populations earns a household income above $60,800 and half earn an income below that point. Same with the house price. Half of sales are above and half are below.

I have some income stats on my "Saskatoon at a Glance" page. They are a little dated, from 2006, but I expect that the various income levels are probably still a pretty good representation of where the money goes. It's at http://www.teamfisher.com/Saskatoon_at_a_Glance/page_1723426.html

Heather,

"Moderately unaffordable" is still unaffordable. I hope that the investors who are buzzing around Saskatoon will give this serious consideration before they jump in and buy, perhaps creating another mini-boom. They need to wonder who they'll resell these properties to six months down the road.

# January 27, 2008 2:57 PM

Doug said:

This is an interesting study Norm, thanks for the post.  I find it interesting that of the 227 markets they looked at, only 49 are cited as being affordable.  That's only 22% of the markets they looked at and a guy has to question how he arrived at his affordibility entry point.

Affordability is relative to me and based on Saskatoon's rank at 77th place, that puts 66% of the markets out there in worse condition than us.  Regina, which is 12/227 is in the top 5% for affordability.  Call me crazy but when I look at the conditions of all these other markets, I just can't help but feel lucky in a lot of ways.

# January 28, 2008 9:40 AM

Heather D. said:

Doug,

You proved me wrong, there ARE people who can still argue Saskatoon's affordability!  I do think it's a great outlook you have, the glass is half full kind of deal.  But sometimes, isn't that also an act of complacency in a less than desirable situation?

This particular affordability study doesn't pull it's numbers out of thin air.  The calculations of these markets using the median value of income and house prices gives a very relevant idea to what's happening.  Outliers will leave some room for interpretation, but the big picture is visible.

My question to you, what do you think makes Saskatoon of equal caliber to cities like Montreal, while being LESS affordable than other cities such as Ottawa?  To me it's not about how much better our market is compared with Los Angeles, London, Victoria, or Calgary that have terribly low affordability... it's about WHY a city with demographics like Saskatoon becomes unaffordable so suddenly?  It seems inevitable, with time growing metropolises become less and less affordable.  But WHY Saskatoon has taken such a dive is beyond me!  We're not even 1/2 of Winnipeg's population, and they're still very affordable.  I feel a major injustice has been served to this city and everyone will be paying for it down the road.

# January 28, 2008 11:27 AM

Alexander Trauzzi said:

Heather, the answer that never leaves peoples' lips is "greed".

I 100% agree with you though.  Increased property values just changes the shape of your society.  It is going to do some severe damage to job markets and a city as small as Saskatoon shouldn't have been so eager to go through these changes.

But the people let it happen because money is on their mind.

Once again, Winnipeg won't be so easy to tip.  Demand is high everywhere, but you won't turn the second hand house market over the same as in other Western provinces.

# January 28, 2008 12:51 PM

Doug said:

Heather, it is a bit of a glass half full kind of attitude.  As much, I like to think that I empathise with the people in these other markets - housing inflation is a global problem and people in Saskatoon are just becoming aware of it because now they have to deal with it.

On your question about why Saskatoon is inflating, its a number of factors really that have come together to create the perfect storm.  My biggest gripe is with the city though because I think our supply of houses could have been much better managed.  A new home costs around $350,000 I think but unless you want to wait 3 years to live in it then you're stuck with the resale market.  If we had managed our inventory of new houses better maybe the resale market wouldn't be climing so high.

In any case, thats my argument - it has little to do with the intrinsic value of property in Saskatoon (although I really like the city and I'm sure many others do) and everything to do with a shortage of property facing excess demand.

# January 28, 2008 1:32 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Doug,

I think you're right. You and I are very lucky because we were able to afford a home. As a whole, this report would show that things are better in Canada than in any of the other nations included in the report. That's good.

At the same time, it's interesting to note that the authors claim that affordability has really just begun to get out of hand at the start of this decade. Prior to that, it took similar percentages of household income to own a home in most countries.

There is some great info in the report about the "median multiplier" and what it means. I gather that when the median multiplier for any market exceeds 3.0, it becomes extremely difficult for people earning incomes at the median to buy in. The "middle class" is essentially shut out and loses the opportunity to purchase and begin to build some wealth.

# January 28, 2008 2:59 PM

Heather D. said:

Alex,

Yes, I really hope that the same thing doesn't happen to Winnipeg.  I would hope MB has learned from SK's mistakes.

Doug,

3 years is excessive.  A recent news story on Saskatoon construction estimated approx. 1 year (which has doubled) to build a single family home.  As far as the price is concerned, in my situation it might be a matter of "who you know".  The contractor I'm meeting with builds for a fairly reasonable price, has a good reputation, and is covered under the New Home Warranty.  Including the lot a new house isn't going to cost me more than $300K.  For a smaller house with no garage a person should be able to build for even less than that.

# January 28, 2008 4:59 PM

Heather D. said:

Doug,

I forgot to say that I definitely agree that the city dropped the ball BIG TIME as far as property shortages go.  That huge influx of Albertans and people moving here from other areas (most of them with deeper pockets than our own) didn't help either.

# January 28, 2008 5:07 PM

Doug said:

Heather, I'd go for it then if its only a year.  I heard the contractors were backlogged you'd be looking at more like 3 but maybe it was just the person I talked to.

Also, $300k for a lot and a house seems pretty cheap - if you decide this is the way to go, I'd check references and confirm pricing.  I heard a lot these days was over 100k.

# January 28, 2008 6:24 PM

Doug said:

Norm,

From what I've read, the inflation all started taking place about 10 years ago as well.  I've read a number of articles asking if globally housing is going to come down but I'm not sure what to make of it all.  I just know that a lot of people have it worse than I do and if it wasn't for the credit crisis it would probably be getting worse.

# January 28, 2008 6:28 PM

Norm Fisher said:

Heather,

On the city dropping the ball; I had an opportunity to speak to council early last January. My primary point was that the shortage of property in Saskatoon was eroding affordability. Values rose 50% here between 2001 and 2006, but nobody had much of an idea what would happen in 2007. I pulled out the video of my presentation this evening and gave it a spin. I must say, I am quite impressed with myself. :)

I'll have to see if I can upload it to YouTube and let you guys have a peek. It's kind of funny actually, as I was nearly crapping my drawers and I had no idea how to address council. Nobody bothered to tell me that I'd only have three minutes and I'm sure I would have spoken for half the evening if the mayor hadn't shut me down. Thankfully, there were some questions which I used to finish the presentation. :)

Doug,

I can't argue that we are better off than 150 of markets surveyed and many more that weren't. I can't help feeling that this is a trend. Perhaps we are one of the last to feel it but it seems to be coming on strong now.

# January 28, 2008 11:08 PM

George said:

Norm and Heather,

I don't know how to post a link, but if you go to www.saskatoon.ca and click on land sales for willowgrove, you will get 2007 prices for lots.  It is a pdf file which shows what lots went for what price. Cheapest was 59k, most expensive was 145k plus gst.  I would expect at least 20% increase due to shortage of labor and tonnes of demand.  The city will try milk this boom for as much as they can.

Everything is so behind in developing the lots.  A guy I work with signed a contract last spring with a building company and the lot was not serviced until the fall.  The building company is not breaking ground until March or April!  Could be two years by the time he gets into his house.  And he thought he would already be in it.  This may be an extreme case or the norm, I don't know.  His lot is in the northern part of willow grove, so it was probably one of the last to be serviced.  I would probably expect the same thing this year.  

# January 29, 2008 11:16 AM

Heather D. said:

Doug/George,

Yes I've been visiting the Land Branch webpage to look at lots previously sold in Willowgrove.  The lot I would need ran between 80K-90K.  A 20% increase would be OUTRAGEOUS, I really hope it's no more than that, or I'm going to lose it!  If it seriously goes up that much, and once the city gets caught up, they're going to have to start discounting lots because they're so overpriced - people aren't going to pay that kind of money once the construction boom is over.

George,

That's weird about your coworker.  Lots are supposed to be serviced before they're sold, unless he entered into a contract with a company that anticipated they would have a lot before they actually bought one.  It seems if a person has a contract through any major construction company they will be waiting a long time.  My contractor's business is smaller.  He started working on 2 houses in summer last year, and has them near completion now.  I will definitely look into him and his company further, get some references, walk through a house he built, etc.  Everything I've heard from other people thus far is nothing but good things.

Norm,

If only Atch had listened to you Saskatoon wouldn't be in such a pickle!  LoL  You should YouTube that video presentation, I'd be interested in seeing it.  :')

# January 29, 2008 12:10 PM

George said:

Heather D,

The reason for last years delay was that from years before the city was only servicing 500-600 lots a year and then jumped up to 2000 in 2007. The city did not have the labor, materials and equipment ready to do same job in the same amount of time as years before. I am not sure if my coworker picked the lot in the draw or went with a building contractor and the lot they got but it took quite a bit of time to get it serviced.

# January 29, 2008 12:37 PM

Alexander Trauzzi said:

Norm,

I think you should get that video up too :)

It's only fair if you get to see me make a fool of myself that I get to see you!

Hehe.  Just kidding, what you did was probably the best anyone has to date.  It's only a shame that politicians are so corrupt they can't see the damage they do.

I feel as though the indecision is mostly intentional.  These guys have friends or friends of friends who are making a lot of money.

# January 29, 2008 1:16 PM

Help! said:

Heather,

You certainly think things need to become more affordable in Saskatoon and seem like the kind of person that would like to help the situation if possible. I am sure there are lots of others on this blog that are desiring a house and feeling the sting of rising inflation. Maybe if you offered the name of your contractor others could put their name in the lot draw and have a hope of owning a house in this market.

# January 29, 2008 9:09 PM

Norm Fisher said:

City council did actually listen. We were there lobbying to see the city open up about 1200 lots in 2007, compared to pace at the time of 600-700 lots. The city agreed to up the ante to 1192 lots for 2007. Some of us had an idea that things were about to go bad but nobody, including Atch really could have predicted what we would be hit with. As it turns out, we probably could have handled 2000, if not for the issue of services and labour.

Alex, I'm swamped right now. I'm helping our board with the launch of a new MLS system and in training for a few days. As soon as I get this behind me I'll figure out how to get the video online and share it with you all. It would be simple enough but it's slightly longer than the YouTube maximum so I need to find a way to squeeze the length. Maybe I'll sound like a nervous chipmunk when it's done. :)

# January 29, 2008 10:38 PM

Alexander Trauzzi said:

Whatever you say in the video, it can't be worse than me in a Hawaiian shirt and big sunglasses sitting in a cubicle reading a script from behind a plant.

:D

# January 30, 2008 8:18 AM

Jason said:

Alex said:

"I feel as though the indecision is mostly intentional.  These guys have friends or friends of friends who are making a lot of money."

There is far more truth to this than you know Alex.

# January 30, 2008 9:55 AM

Heather D. said:

Help!,

I'd love to do that for people, and give my contractor some exposure if he were interested in more projects.  However, it would not be wise of me to give out this information.  If somebody wanted to build a larger house and pay him more I could lose my place in line.  Until I am in a contract with him and I have my hands on a lot I won't be sharing him with anyone quite yet.  Sorry.

On a similar note, I'd recommend for anyone considering building to drive around the developing areas and write down company names and phone numbers on the signs.  Some of these companies will be smaller, and ultimately cheaper than if you went through the larger construction companies.

# January 30, 2008 10:03 AM

Jesse said:

Heather,

I'm with you on the insanity of the market up here in this city in the middle of nowhere...it's all propaganda being spun around to make this city (Saskatoon) sound like it's 'the place to be' when in reality myself, and others like me who are in the one income earners will be EVACUATING this province as quick as possible unless a HUUUUGE correction is done, which i can't see happening because people seem to just ignore and have more money than brains for some reason...

Living in stabbsville isn't even an option for myself as my measelly $44grand a year job will get me a mortgage for 40 years at around $120grand...

Rent keeps increasing up up up. I did hear however something that made me laugh at CBC this morning and a city councellor who up till this point has been pushing how the market inflating here is GOOD for EVERYONE...and how condo conversions are great for the economy...now that same person seems to have changed sides...why? Someone in their own family CAN'T FIND A PLACE TO LIVE. Amazing what selfish people are in this city / province.

# January 30, 2008 12:16 PM

Heather D. said:

Jesse,

My brother is in the same boat you are.  This is a terrible market for singletons, and basically all first time home buyers.  There is a growing gap between the weathly and impoverished.  Definitely a large part of this city's boom has been about greed, but it's the lower/middle class people who enabled it and ultimately are capable of stopping it.

All we can do is create an un-buzz. (as Alex would say)  Start discussions amongst your friends, family, coworkers.  Talk about the U.S. recession, unstable stockmarkets, suffering exports industry, etc.  If people don't get it through their thick heads that this kind of growth is unsustainable we're going to suffer much more in the following years than we would if we stopped this here and now.  Some people (such as myself) have chosen not to buy into the resale market - many are waiting until things cool down.

I'm afraid Saskatoon is going to lose many young professionals to other more affordable cities such as Regina and Winnipeg.  This will leave low income earners who can't afford real estate and others who are already in the market.  There will be no room for first time home buyers.

# January 30, 2008 1:04 PM

Jesse said:

Thanks Heather, it's good to hear (well not good but you know what i mean) that someone else is in a similar situation...I had a woman at work come up to me today and tell me how i should look into buying a house and that there are plennnnnnnnnnnty of good properties on the west side yadda yadda.

I simply told her that i wans't able to get a mortgage big enough, she went into it more reiterating how there are 'good properties' on the west side and i had to phrase it differently saying 'i simply don't get paid enough'. She left and i don't think she still understands what it's like out there.

So crazy., and again thanks!

Jesse

# January 30, 2008 7:43 PM

CIndy said:

Jesse, Heather...

I feel for you.  I really and truly believe that eventually, what goes up has to come down.  Ultimately, we left for lots of reasons.  I just heard that Suncor is putting up 19 billion into Ft. McMoney.  Eggads.  

I don't know if the human species is capable of understanding that we cant drink oil and we cant eat money.  But, the really wealthy don't give a ##it because its not in their backyard.  It will take a collective screaming from the mass that VOTE - ie you and I to change this country.  Unfortunately, right now - lots of politics is about greasing the economy (and the business dealings that drive it).  First they have to suck you in to voting for them, then - Such as your lovely premier Mr. Brad Wall (going against regulations) trying to set up a Nuclear plant because its - good for the economy and greener.  Well, Mr Wall, I would fully support you in your decision as long as your first born lives next to the nuclear plant or works in it for 10-20 years.

The people of SK are fundementally outstanding.  I was shocked to see some of the greed that took fever.  Yes, there are those that have thrived because of it.  But - were you not doing well enough before the boom?  Now many of your fellow humans in Saskatoon are really suffering - needlessly.  Hardworking people with good ethics that need places to live.  But hey - they don't have money driving the economy so while your at it, why dont you take a crap in their breakfast?

# January 30, 2008 9:37 PM

Heather D. said:

Jesse,

There are a LOT of people who don't know how bad it is out there.  If they already own their property they usually aren't current with what's going on with the real estate market.  They've seen articles about recent inflation etc. but aren't aware of how much affordability has declined.

Cindy,

Isn't THAT the truth!  Saskatoon was doing just fine before the boom.  Our economy wasn't in decline, we weren't suffering, we had jobs, we were growing.  We did NOT need this one bit.  There will be more suffering ahead, as long as people are just interested in what's in it for them and aren't concerned with the overall success of this city.

# January 31, 2008 11:10 AM

Alexander Trauzzi said:

I think my past interest in Saskatoon and perspective on it as a decent place to grow IT supports you Heather.

Now, I can't say the same.  The city has allowed itself to become a hazard to anyone who wants to make future-proof decisions.

# January 31, 2008 11:33 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required) 

 

Comment Notification

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS